McX said:
How do I respond to: do you have any guns in your vehicle?
Your thoughts, and experiences?
I can tell you from personal experience that answering "yes, I do" is a BAD idea.
Especially in Brookfield.
If I had it to do over again, I would have remained silent or said "why do you ask" or "why do you need to know"?
Also would keep the window rolled up enough that the officer can't reach in & unlock, then open my door.
It's a sad day when the simple truth of not breaking a law can be used against you by a gov't official.
(Luckily the DA read the laws & refused to do anything more to me.)
CalicoJack10 said:
...without consent of the vehicles owner, police officers in Wisconsin can no longer search any vehicle even if evidence is in plain sight.
Any idea on when this changed?
Because it used to be that anything they could see through the window was fair game.
Good reason to keep the inside of the car clean, or at least throw a blanket over things.
Even with this new interpretation, they could hold you 'til they got a search warrant, based on what they can see or smell.
Nutczak said:
If you get the demand to step out of the vehicle, make sure all windows and doors are closed, lock the doors, and place the keys in your pocket. This will eliminate what many police are referring to now as "A terry frisk of the vehicle"
Again, except in Brookfield.
They stole my keys from my pocket (over my loud & clear refusal to accede to any search of myself or my car), unlocked & searched my car, opened the completely zipped case, & seized my pistol.
At best, I made their crime worse & more apparent for the DA.
It sure didn't stop them from doing the deed. They claimed it was "for your safety & ours". How could anything (other than a bomb) inside the (locked) car be a danger to any of us, esp. when I was at least 30' away & in cuffs??
The stop was for "Loud exhaust" he got a surprised look on his face when I asked what the decibel reading was on my truck, and what the law says maximum decibels are. And the last time his decibel meter was calibrated. Surprisingly he stated he did not have a decibel meter, so then I asked what benchmark he used to determine that my exhaust was in fact loud, and compared to what?
This subjective crap law we have now doesn't hold up when a cop writes a ticket for one of those deafeningly loud exhausts (esp. on motorcycles), & the driver goes to court with entirely reasonable questions like yours.
The law needs to be re-written to include X decibels at Y inches and at what general angle from the end of the muffler / tailpipe, and at idle or revving to what RPM.
(Directly behind? 90 degrees? 2000RPM? 5000RPM?)
[rant]
I ride.
I value riding, so I don't do it in a way that infuriates others who don't ride but do vote, who might get it into their heads to restrict my rights because of the actions of others. (Sort of how we law-abiding open carriers can't carry concealed because criminals have acted badly.)
I obey (most of) the rules of the road. (I have a bit of a heavy throttle hand.)
I wish we could split lanes here in WI, but even when it's very tempting I don't. One more law that needs to be changed.
My mufflers are quieter than required by law, in large part because I value my hearing, but also because I don't want to be rude & annoy everyone I pass. Noise has no effect on involvement in a crash. It's not a safety feature. And by altering the exhaust system, you're changing (generally lowering) the power output. [/rant]