I'm not going to register just to drop in uninvited (except by you) in the middle of a conversation. And despite your claim that they are only going to be swayed by logic, I contend that academics - especially those whose viewpoints I can only guage from a single glance at three posts - are more swayed by rhetoric than the average guest stat on the Jerry Springer Show.
The science of physics may be controlled by cold hard theory, openly debated between poo-flinging adherents of competing camps, but academe itself has a certain "cultural bias" all its own that makes the National Democrat Party seem stogily conservative in comparison.
As for any help you might want, I've got a question: seeing as the OP there is generally OK with OC by other folks and the other two posters seem to generally agree that different strokes work for different folks and countries, what do you need help with? As long as whomever it might be is not demanding that my gun be confiscated and I be locked up for even thinking about possessing it, I'm generally OK with them. If they want to discuss "rational restrictions" then I'll figure out if they just want to spout their line or actually exchange points of view and then decide if a discussion is worth the effort. Since at least the OP has not gotten grief from the two (so far) responses, I'm wondering if you are looking to throw gasoline on the fire or what.
Give us some help figuring out what help you want from us, OK?