Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Gun buy back

  1. #1
    Regular Member mtlhdtodd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Federal Way, Wa

    Gun buy back

    Now this is how the gun buy back programs should be.

    My only issue is if this would be covered by private party sales or if this org uses a Federally licensed dealer for the transfer to individuals that TAG gives the guns to. Using a dealer, while not necessarily required, would remove even the appearance of impropriaty.

  2. #2
    Campaign Veteran T Dubya's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Richmond, Va, ,
    The term "Gun buy back" is wrong. It implies that the government owned the guns in the first place. If you must use the term "gun buy back" put it into quotations.
    Last edited by T Dubya; 03-02-2011 at 10:13 AM.

  3. #3
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
    I think it's a superb idea!

    The article mentioned $30,000 in Visa vouchers for groceries. Gee, I wonder which taxpayers those funds came from? TAG's alternative will not only cost the taxpayers $0 funds, it's putting those firearms into the hands of law-abiding citizens who would otherwise be able to afford self-defense.

    Talk about a win-win situation!

    I'd love to seen some follow-up on this. I'd be interested in knowing how many folks go with TAG, and how many folks go with the APD.
    The First protects the Second, and the Second protects the First. OO-RAH!!! Together, they protect the rest of our Bill of Rights and other founding documents.

    As for President Trump, he's getting the job done.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts