Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Extreme Vacation Cruise? instead of the same-old, same-old?

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    fl
    Posts
    1,835

    Extreme Vacation Cruise? instead of the same-old, same-old?

    Hmmm... could be fun..

    http://www.somalicruises.com/

  2. #2
    Regular Member Chap's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Greenville, MS
    Posts
    213

    Awesome

    Haha......................... damn, count me in.

    Group rate, I wonder?

    Chap
    Kimber Ultra Carry II .45 ACP, 3" barrel 1911 with a Mitch Rosen holster

    New additions to the family -
    XDm .45 ACP 02FEB11,
    Ruger LCP .380 05FEB11

  3. #3
    Regular Member SFCRetired's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Montgomery, Alabama, USA
    Posts
    1,769
    Shame nobody will actually do this. It would serve two purposes: It would make whoever put it into operation a huge pile of money until the handwringers at the UN put them out of business and it would also eliminate a lot of pirates.

    It would have to be a large vessel flagged in some country that would not care about the pirates being targeted. There are some landside legal hurdles that would have to be surmounted, but that could be done quite easily.

    Who do we know that has a few million they would be willing to invest?

  4. #4
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    fl
    Posts
    1,835
    Actually, the U.S. could flag it (if we had the nads..). The Privateering acts have never been rescinded- they're still valid, and active..just they havent been issued in a while..

    No letter of marque has been legitimately issued by the United States since the nineteenth century. The status of submarine hunting Goodyear airships in the early days of the second world war has created significant confusion. According to one story, the United States Navy issued a Letter of Marque to the Airship Resolute on the West Coast of the United States at the beginning of World War II, making it the first time the US Navy commissioned a privateer since the War of 1812.[14] This story, along with various other accounts referring to the airships Resolute and Volunteer as operating under a "privateer status", is highly dubious. Since neither the Congress nor did the President appear to have authorized a privateer during the war, the Navy would not have had the authority to do so by itself.[15]

  5. #5
    Regular Member DevinWKuska's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Spanaway
    Posts
    300
    Pfft... you guys figure out the legal stuff.. I am sure with a lil help of advertising we could get the funding to get that ship sailing... btw would also like to suggest it be a larger tanker style vessel that could deploy "zodiacs" for up close and personal encounters. Of course they would have to sign a waiver saying the ship or its crew are not responsible if you get in the way of the 12 yr old with the RPG's.
    "So there I was between a rock and a hard place, when it hit me... What am I doing on this side of the rock?"

  6. #6
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Seattle, Washington, USA
    Posts
    923
    Quote Originally Posted by j4l View Post
    ........ Since neither the Congress nor did the President appear to have authorized a privateer during the war, the Navy would not have had the authority to do so by itself.......[15]
    True the Navy lacks the authority, so does the president.

    Only Congress can grant letters of marque and reprisal. Then again only Congress has the power to declare war and, well ...............
    A wise and frugal Government, which shall restrain men from injuring one another, shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry and improvement, and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has earned. This is the sum of good government.- Thomas Jefferson March 4 1801

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •