They are not that much different than we are. Some make irrational generalizations about OCers, and some make thoughtful posts.
Some here make irrational generalizations about LEOs, and some make thoughtful posts.
One posted that thinking like a criminal would help us understand why OC is ill-advised. He pointed out that criminals want to get the money, not get shot, and get away. Once an OCer was spotted, that carrier would become the first target.
Apparently, he never heard the story of the OCers deterring a robbery in a Kennesaw Waffle House. You see, the not getting shot is priority one for criminals. They'd just as soon leave and then either go someplace else or come back later. Their self-interest, to the expense of all else, prompts them to act in a cowardly manner unless they have the unquestionable upper hand. Knowing that another is armed raises the question of advantage, and an act of cowardice will usually result.
That's not to say that a BG will never target an OCer. However, the lack of reports to date would indicate that BGs will almost never take the OCer out and that the LEO who made that post is not capable of truly thinking like the criminal.
