anmut
Regular Member
Apparently he doesn't have enough on his plate and our fearless leader now wants to close our ability to buy guns without a background check:
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ed-calling-better-gun-sale-background-checks/
SNIP:
Obama suggested three areas for reform: enforcement of gun control laws already on the books through better implementation of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System; rewards for states that keep the best data -- "and therefore do the most to protect our citizens"; and a faster and nimbler network that provides "an instant, accurate, comprehensive and consistent system for background checks to sellers who want to do the right thing."
And while the president acknowledged that some gun owners will never support his call, he argued that weak background checks are bad for police officers, law-abiding citizens and gun sellers.
"If we're serious about keeping guns away from someone who's made up his mind to kill, then we can't allow a situation where a responsible seller denies him a weapon at one store, but he effortlessly buys the same gun someplace else," he wrote, in reference to the "gun show loophole" that gun control advocates say enables people to avoid background checks.
Time to start writing Mr. Johnson and Mr. Duffy some letter and ringing some phones. What part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED does this assclown not understand??
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/201...ed-calling-better-gun-sale-background-checks/
SNIP:
Obama suggested three areas for reform: enforcement of gun control laws already on the books through better implementation of the National Instant Criminal Background Check System; rewards for states that keep the best data -- "and therefore do the most to protect our citizens"; and a faster and nimbler network that provides "an instant, accurate, comprehensive and consistent system for background checks to sellers who want to do the right thing."
And while the president acknowledged that some gun owners will never support his call, he argued that weak background checks are bad for police officers, law-abiding citizens and gun sellers.
"If we're serious about keeping guns away from someone who's made up his mind to kill, then we can't allow a situation where a responsible seller denies him a weapon at one store, but he effortlessly buys the same gun someplace else," he wrote, in reference to the "gun show loophole" that gun control advocates say enables people to avoid background checks.
Time to start writing Mr. Johnson and Mr. Duffy some letter and ringing some phones. What part of SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED does this assclown not understand??