~*'Phoenix'*~
Regular Member
So no open carried knives? But I guess it's usually legal already...
-
We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
-
If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
-
Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.
HB 517 in House Judiciary Committee 3/24/2011 8am
- Thread starter StogieC
- Start date
So no open carried knives? But I guess it's usually legal already...
rvrctyrngr
Regular Member
I believe the bill does not amend 790.053. It just adds OC of firearms for license holders to 790.06.
Last edited:
skk123
Regular Member
Who was that clown that came up before Marian Hammer from the NRA, totally unprofessional, just emotional screaming and then just walks off not allowing any questions.
skk123
Regular Member
BAH! TPed again.
I saw that i swear they were going to throw him out!
Last edited:
nigmalg
Regular Member
It was TP'd again?? man I'm getting nervous. This and the delays for SB234 are making me uneasy.
I'm so confused... debating again.
I'm so confused... debating again.
Last edited:
77zach
Regular Member
My video lagged out! Was he for OR against!!! If he was FOR it you can be sure it was an op. A false flag op launched by the anti's.
Cruizer
New member
He was against it. In his words
totally down
Last edited:
77zach
Regular Member
Thank god.
nigmalg
Regular Member
One of the representatives mentioned how the bill didn't prohibit carrying the weapon "In your hand". I thought carrying the weapon in a threatening method was already illegal? Waving it around and such is already banned.
She was corrected. How much to bet they still still votes "Nay" even though her worry was addressed? It's such a party line game.
Last edited:
Kingfish
Regular Member
517 passed committee!!!!!
77zach
Regular Member
My freaking internet wouldn't play it but for a few seconds at a time, and I couldn't stand those LEO pukes trashing freedom. It was TP'd, right?
Kingfish
Regular Member
Apparently it was TP's and then brought right back up. Only TP's for a few minutes.
I caught the very end where the author was doing his closing. They then took a vote and recommended the bill.
Last edited:
ixtow
Founder's Club Member
Did the "handguns only" amendment stick?
Not that it matters a whole lot... I just find their 'worries,' and the ridiculous and unrelated crap they do as a result of those 'worries' to be entertaining.
Not that it matters a whole lot... I just find their 'worries,' and the ridiculous and unrelated crap they do as a result of those 'worries' to be entertaining.
Yes, the handguns only amendment is in there. Neither Florida Carry nor NRA had any objection to it, as it is there solely to placate the neurotic and would only affect a tiny fraction of carriers. In fact, Florida Carry requests only openly carried handguns at our OC fishing events so as not to unduly alarm the sheeple.
ixtow
Founder's Club Member
I largely agree. Even a Minimum Length Carbine cannot be carried in a practical 'holstered' manner.
I'm only concerned that an Officer can pretend not to know the difference. It has been seen before, where a giant revolver or some more unconventional pistols (such as mine) have been falsely referred to as a rifle just for the sake of screwing with people.
It's just another loophole to give them qualified immunity for a willfully and knowingly executed false arrest...
"No adequate firearms allowed. And we'll pretend your gun is on the 'prohibited' guns list even if it isn't."
If this is what passes, I won't bother getting my permit. Useless, feel-good legislation. Back to plan A: Get out of this cesspool excuse for a State. And I most certainly will pause to make sure I can rub my butt on the door as I leave.
As I originally predicted, those making the calls here have no interest in making OC a Right for all, but a Privilege of the Only Ones. Even if I were rich, I refuse to be an Only One. I'm better than that.
Last edited:
Rick H
Regular Member
When did these bills get amended whereas to go into law upon signed into law? And does this mean that if Gov.Scott was to sign it in, lets say April or My it would in fact become law at that point or would we still have to wait until July 1?