Legislators Who Have Not Committed to OPPOSING SB 1094

From NoMagBan.com by NSSF!

These are the Names of the Legislators, & or potentail socalist's who do not have the intestional fortitued, to reconize this is the Constitution State, & openly declare the Mag Ban is cheap panic useless madness!

Let's face it they allready know the way there going to vote, so lets EMAIL, CALL & NOT LET THEM HEAR THE END OF IT! Let everyone Know they hold THEIR OWN thwarted views over the Law, The Constitution & liberty itself!

:cuss:Tell everyone about this group of egotisical socialist losers!
:cuss:



Legislators Who Have Not Committed to Opposing SB 1094
All gun owners, sportsmen and hunters are encouraged to contact the following legislators immediately and urge them to oppose SB 1094!

Chair Eric Coleman
Eric.Coleman@cga.ct.gov

Chair Gerald Fox
Gerald.Fox@cga.ct.gov

Vice Chair Gary Holder-Winfield
Gary.Holder-Winfield@cga.ct.gov

Senator Beth Bye
Beth.Bye@senatedems.ct.gov

Senator Edwin Gomes
Edwin.Gomes@senatedems.ct.gov

Senator Andrew Roraback
Andrew.Roraback@cga.ct.gov

Representative David Baram
David.Baram@cga.ct.gov

Representative Charles Clemons
Charles.Clemons@cga.ct.gov

Representative Patricia Dillon
Patricia.Dillon@cga.ct.gov

Representative Mae Flexer
Mae.Flexer@cga.ct.gov

Representative Mary Fritz
Mary.Fritz@cga.ct.gov

Representative Bob Godfrey
Bob.Godfrey@cga.ct.gov

Representative Minnie Gonzalez
Minnie.Gonzalez@cga.ct.gov

Representative Auden Grogins
Auden.Grogins@cga.ct.gov

Representative Gail Hamm
Gail.Hamm@cga.ct.gov

Representative Ernest Hewett
Ernest.Hewett@cga.ct.gov

Representative Melissa Olson
Melissa.Olson@cga.ct.gov

Representative Kelvin Roldan
Kelvin.Roldan@cga.ct.gov

Representative Joseph Serra
Joseph.Serra@cga.ct.gov

Representative Joseph Taborsak
Joseph.Taborsak@cga.ct.gov

Representative William Tong
William.Tong@cga.ct.gov

Representative Toni Walker
Toni.Walker@cga.ct.gov

Representative Elissa Wright
Elissa.Wright@cga.ct.gov

Representative Richard Smith
richard.smith@housegop.ct.gov

Were outnumberd in known Votes "Here's the good guy's"

:lol:Here's the GOOD GUY'S & GIRL'S you can clearly see we are outnumbered in known votes compared to the above list:lol:


:lol::lol::lol::lol:Legislators Who Have Committed to Opposing SB 1094
The following legislators have committed to opposing this dangerous magazine ban. You may wish to thank them for their continued opposition to SB 1094.:lol::lol::lol:

Senator Doyle
Doyle@senatedems.ct.gov

Representative Berger
Jeffrey.Berger@cga.ct.gov

Representative Morris
Bruce.Morris@cga.ct.gov

Representative O'Neill
Arthur.ONeill@housegop.ct.gov

Representative Simanski
bill.simanski@housegop.ct.gov

Representative Rowe
TR.Rowe@housegop.ct.gov

Representative Labriola
David.Labriola@housegop.ct.gov

Representative Klarides
Themis.Klarides@housegop.ct.gov

Representative Carpino
christie.carpino@housegop.ct.gov

Representative Hovey
DebraLee.Hovey@housegop.ct.gov

Senator Kissell
John.A.Kissel@cga.ct.gov

Senator McLachlan
Michael.McLachlan@cga.ct.gov

Senator Welch
Jason.Welch@cga.ct.gov

Senator Meyer
Meyer@senatedems.ct.gov

Representative Hetherington
John.Hetherington@housegop.ct.gov

Representative Adinolfi
al.adinolfi@housegop.ct.gov

Representative Shaban
john.shaban@housegop.ct.gov

Representative Sampson
rob.sampson@housegop.ct.gov

Hello,

Be sure to include this link when you email them. http://www.fredsm14stocks.com/article.asp?ITEM=8

Or better yet, just copy & paste the entire article to your email.

Messages Sent

Just finished sending my messages to the former list. I got a reply from Sen. Meyer a few days back in opposition, for which I thanked him. Keep their servers busy!

I fired one off to my only holdout in Middletown. I even invited him out to the range for a demonstration!

Joseph Serra

I'll post here when I get a reply.

Jonathan

Here is what I wrote and e-mailed to the list of opposer's:

I am writing to you today about SB 1094. I hope that you will consider what I have to say before voting on this bill.

AN ACT BANNING LARGE CAPACITY AMMUNITION MAGAZINES.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened:
Section 1. (NEW) (Effective July 1, 2011) (a) As used in this section, "large capacity magazine" means any detachable ammunition feeding device with the capacity to accept more than ten rounds of ammunition, but does not include: (1) A feeding device that has been permanently altered so that it cannot accommodate more than ten rounds, (2) a .22 caliber tube ammunition feeding device, or (3) a tubular magazine that is contained in a lever-action firearm.
(b) Any person who possesses a large capacity magazine shall be guilty of a class D felony.
(c) Any person who (1) prior to the effective date of this section, lawfully possessed a large capacity magazine, and (2) not later than ninety days after the effective date of this section, removes such magazine from this state or surrenders such magazine to an organized local police department or the Department of Public Safety for destruction, shall not be subject to prosecution for a violation of subsection (b) of this section.

As an honest, law abiding, tax paying member of our state of Connecticut who also owns firearms, I feel unjustly “targeted” because this law would turn me into a felon for simply possessing “high capacity” magazines if the law were to go into effect. Owners of “large capacity” magazines are not criminals or individuals intent on committing atrocious acts; they are sportsmen or firearm enthusiasts who own the magazines for a variety of reasons, including sport, competition or more importantly, self-defense. For the “Constitution State” to have the right confiscate my private property and infringe on my 2nd amendment rights doesn’t seem to fit too well into the ideals of the US Constitution.

2nd amendment as ratified by the States: A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

I also possess a valid CT pistol permit, so I have already gone through many background checks at the local and federal level. As you can see, I, like most of my fellow CT gun owners respect the law, that is why we obtained our guns legally through the proper channels and will respect this law too if it were to go into effect.

I’m sure the tragedy in Arizona is weighing heavily on your mind, but think of what this bill does not solve. We both know the gun permitting process isn’t going to weed out every unstable or dangerous person out there, but responsible citizens like me, along with the vast majority of other gun owners respect laws, criminals don’t care about the laws they break! It would still be very easy to purchase “high capacity” magazines of state and drive them back across state lines back into CT. Criminals wouldn’t think twice about the laws they are breaking, because they don’t have any respect for you or the law! Nor will they turn in the “high capacity” magazines because they would be considered illegal if this bill passes. Why, because criminals don’t have any respect for you or the law! All this bill accomplishes is to punish the responsible citizens of this state!

Please do the right thing and vote AGAINST SB 1094! Please don’t take away my rights, I’m not the criminal!

Thank you for taking your time to read my letter,
Marc

I hope they do take the time to read it!

Marc, can I copy your letter for my emails I send out? It's spot on perfect!

H8Rain said:

Marc, can I copy your letter for my emails I send out? It's spot on perfect!

Click to expand...

Just sent out my mass email to the whole group, i hope it makes a small difference

I sent a short to the point message outlining my opposition to SB1094 to every member of the committee.
I also submitted written testimony at the hearing, I don't know what else I can do except to hope for favorable outcome.

H8Rain said:

Marc, can I copy your letter for my emails I send out? It's spot on perfect!

Click to expand...

Go for it!

I would be willing to take Part in a Peaceful Demonstration

I would be willing to take Part in a Peaceful Demonstration, by the size of the turn out at the hearing it seems allot would ..... The Best place would be right in front of the Legislators house. Lets see how they & their neighbor's would feel with a bunch of peaceful sign holding folks, that would stir the pot, i think it's too late they know how their going to vote, too many letters have already been written, they just delete them.

This hits close to home they will come to your house to arrest you if you don't turn in your Mag's if passed. & you will be embarrassed in front of your neighbor's, HOW ABOUT EMBARRASSING THEM in front of their neighbor's, EVERY TIME THEIR NEIGHBORS SEE THEM, WALKING OUT TO THEIR CAR, TAKING OUT THE TRASH, OR PLAYING WITH THEIR CHILDREN, THEY'LL KNOW THEY LIVE NEXT TO A SOCIALIST, & TALK BEHIND THEIR BACK EVERY-TIME THEY SEE THEM!

WE OWE IT TO THEIR NEIGHBORS TO LET THEM KNOW THEY LIVE NEXT DOOR TO THE MOST UNAMERICAN, COMMUNIST RADICALS IN THE CT LEGISLATURE.