People v Hale doesn't enter into this at all for what you describe. You may want to examine Clark though for a clarification about what "loaded" means.
Why wouldnt people vs Hale enter into this... they stated that a concealed mag was equivalent to a concealed gun. The law specifically makes amends in certain situations for concealed guns, such as propperly being transported in a vehicle. But, it makes no such law about mags. So, concealing them according to people vs Hale would therefore then be illegal, wouldn't it? IF not, why wouldn't it be?
Thanks!
Oh, and while I am asking... a firearm can be loaded and open carried in a temporary residence or campsite, but there is no mention in 12026 (the clauses usurping the anti-concealment laws of 12025) about those places... so, would one need to openly wear his loaded firearm to sleep without covers on so as to not conceal his weapon in his campsite/hotel room.... would being inside a tent/hotel room be considered concealment in this case? In fact, even if it wasn't loaded, 12025 - 12026 makes no allotment for campsite or temporary residence... so, what would one do with his/her firearm at night? Lock it up in his/her vehicle or in his/her nightstand or something of the sorts since it is then not concealed on your person? See below for the vehicle locking up option....
12026.1 says that it is lawful to transport or CARRY a firearm in your car provided that it is locked away and...
(2) The firearm is carried by the person directly to or from any
motor vehicle
for any lawful purpose and, while carrying the firearm,
the firearm is contained within a locked container.
What does lawful purpose mean? The answer to this would help answer my question above about storing the firearm in your car overnight.
But...
12026.2 appears to be a stringent restating of 12026.1. 12026.2 says that other than two instances, it is not posession but lawful transport that is legally usruping 12025 and even then the route between the two lawful places must be somewhat direct; though then at the bottom seems to open it up for 12026.1 to still be in full affect to carry. Is 12026.1's "lawful purpose" defined in 12026.2? Does 12026.2 negate the Carry function of 12026.1? If so, then one could not store their firearm in their vehicle because that would be carrying and not transporting. In fact, if this was how it is to be read, then one would be lawful to have a loaded firearm in ones hotel room, but transporting it to that room would not be lawful... which would then make having it not lawful.
Thoughts?