Good Grief!
Their logic is so warped and twisted it's pathetic. Take the following quote as an example:
"Today a Maplewood police officer would generally not be able to stop an individual with an open carry to determine his or her identification. Unfortunately, in many cases, the officer can only take action after the individual has committed a crime with the weapon and this is simply not acceptable. We as government officials have the right and authority to legislate such conduct, and to me it would be a violation of our oath of office not to protect the majority of our citizens who do not approve of open carry."
Three questions:
Mayor James White says when a person is OCing, officers are unable to stop them and determine their identification.
1. However, when a person is CCing, whether legally or illegally, how is the officer going to know they're carrying at all?
At least with OC, they know the individual is armed.
2. What need exists to determine the identification of a law-abiding citizen engaged in a lawful activity?
This is just ridiculous (slippery slope), akin to someone claiming they "need" to stop all drivers to ascertain their identity simply because they're driving one to three ton vehicles whose accidental death rate is more than 20 times greater than that for firearms.
3. How does disapproval of a law-abiding activity translate into a need for protection from that law-abiding activity?
This too is ridiculous (faulty premise). Since OC is a lawful activity in the state of Missouri, a law-abiding citizen who engages in the lawful activity of OC is NO threat to other citizens. Zero. Zip. Nada. Zilch.
I could spend an hour deconstructing the mayor's comments with a rigorous analysis involving logical fallacy. Suffice it to say that when it comes to law-abiding citizens exercising their Constitutional rights under the Second Amendment, the mayor is "conceptually challenged."
Missourans are in desperate need of a change to their state laws so as to allow Constitutional carry and preempt backwater anti-Constitutionalists such as those running the town of Maplewood.