Here's a recommended modification which will shorten that down to one sentance:
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the People to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
For some reason, that sounds familiar...
Regardless, if it were actually written somewhere in law, let alone our Constitution, it would render the Ft. Carson regulation illegal. Since we all know and trust our government, and certainly our military officers, who are sworn to protect our Constution against all enemies foreign and domestic, and would NEVER stoop to endorsing a regulation which violated that oath, the Ft. Carson reg must be legit, right?
(crickets stop chirping...)