a backpack-that-couldn't-be-holding-much-other-than-some-giant-gun-but-really-who-would-believe-a-gun-that-big-would-be-carried-concealed-so-we-kinda-doubt-it.
That's the idea of the luger thread.
I've shelved my AMD-65 thigh holster project in favor of a backpack-that-couldn't-be-holding-much-other-than-some-giant-gun-but-really-who-would-believe-a-gun-that-big-would-be-carried-concealed-so-we-kinda-doubt-it.
Concealment is about stifling discussion, chilling the right, and forcing carry of ineffective calibers.
Concealment is about stifling discussion, chilling the right, and forcing carry of ineffective calibers.
"Ineffective calibers"? You mean 9mm, .40 S&W and .45ACP are "ineffective"?
Compared to what?
"Ineffective calibers"? You mean 9mm, .40 S&W and .45ACP are "ineffective"?
Compared to what?
i thought concealment was about hiding your gun.
im in good shape... actually most would call me skinny.. parents say to skinny
but i carry a CZ P-07 duty 9mm everywhere and i dont print at all
my friend carrys a 1911 .45 and he doesnt print either
we both use cross breed supertuck holsters which help but you can cc almost any pistol.
Would like to know if i can wear a super tight shirt when this bill passes just so u can see the outline of the gun?
im in good shape... actually most would call me skinny.. parents say to skinny
but i carry a CZ P-07 duty 9mm everywhere and i dont print at all
my friend carrys a 1911 .45 and he doesnt print either
we both use cross breed supertuck holsters which help but you can cc almost any pistol.
Would like to know if i can wear a super tight shirt when this bill passes just so u can see the outline of the gun?
"Ineffective calibers"? You mean 9mm, .40 S&W and .45ACP are "ineffective"?
Compared to what?
I quite clearly said nothing of the sort. I said .32acp and .380acp are ineffective defense calibers.
1911? G20/21? Out of luck. Only fat people can CC those guns. Pardon me for being in decent shape...
You know I can't stand to hear about ineffective calibers, I promise you this, Volunteer to allow me to test my calibers and I will, I have a perfect place for you to stand and that is approximately 30 feet away and with out armor, If you can handle it, Then I will say the caliber I use is ineffective..., It is a personal choice that people use, I don't personally want to be shot with anything even a BB, Cause the placement is far more effective than the caliber... I have seen damage and death from BB's to 44 mags and one from a 12 gauge.. So the caliber doesn't matter as much as the placement.
This is usually true but when dealing with a doped up criminal on PCP or equivalent I am not trusting noting less than a 40 cal to take his damn head off or at least his legs.
And me, I have a dickie-do, and couldn't make it to the end of my driveway walking fast. But none of this matters anyway because you can print for all to see.
I do agree as I carry a 40 Caliber "Glock" and at times when dressed where I can, I carry my 1911 (45 cal) on the out side of my belt, I would prefer the 40 over the 45 only cause it is dark colored and not stainless, But the larger caliber are my carry calibers...
where'd you get that quote from?
i don't carry my 9 or 40 because it's hard to conceal under my normal clothing. i'm stuck with my 6+1 .380ACP
So your in shape, Who says that, You.. No offense, This should be about guns and gun related stuff, Not fat and skinny... Even a boney man can conceal a gun if he has clothes on and has any sense... so are you naked or ignorant? just wondering, cause fat and skinny is makes no difference!
While its difficult to conceal my P95, I have a Kahr CW45 that conceals quite nicely under even a thin shirt. With an extra mag in a holster as well, I do not feel like I am sacrificing anything.
Don't feel like you are ineffective either. Having something is better than having nothing, shot placement is key.
When and if available.shot placement is key.