As of Tues. UT is $65, and if WI eventually issues permits and if WI also recognizes UT, then we'll have to have a WI permit to get (or renew) a UT permit.
Why get a UT or FL permit? Because they're already recognized in so many states.
Who knows where/if WI would be recognized. More time & money wasted by our state legislature fussing with reciprocity.
I've had a FL permit since 2003. I'm two years into my 2nd one. My MN permit expires in July of this year... my 5 years is up there. Living in a "no-concealed-carry" state, I know the value of non-res permits. If WI issues permits, and MN does not honor them, then I'll get a UT permit which they will honor, and will no longer need the FL. I got the FL because my sister lives there, and it's the only way a WI resident could carry there, as FL does not recognize non-res permits from other states (such as UT or MN) but they do issue their own permits to non-res. Hopefully they'll honor a WI permit. Permit "bingo"... I love it. The 1st year or so I messed with this stuff, I was totally confused... but now I've got it all memorized as to who honors what.
Our legislature won't be fussing with reciprocity issues. There likely won't be any issues on this end, because WI will accept all other states permits. What's to discuss? The only out-of-state permits they won't honor are those held by wisconsinites. Whether other states accept ours is out of our hands, that's up to them. And besides that, it's not the legislature that fusses with reciprocity. It's the governing body that oversees the permits, such as Dept of Justice, State Police, etc. That varies from State to State, in FL it's the Dept of Agriculture. In WI's bill, it'd be the DOJ that would handle any issues, if there were any.