TechnoWeenie
Regular Member
So I went into a store, and he had a shotgun that was NOT a shotgun, claimed it was built as a pistol, but NOT an AOW, and required the state pistol transfer paperwork.
It did NOT have a buttstock, only a pistol grip, and was not designed with a buttstock.
I found the AG opinion Link which says that you can (under state law at least) cut down one of these 'pistols', as it's a pistol under state law, and not a shotgun...
BUT... where does federal law come into this? Because IIRC, a shotgun with only a pistol grip was considered to be an AOW....
It currently has an 18.5" barrel on it, but I think it'd be awesome to cut it down if I bought it, but it seems to me that it'd be in violation of federal law.. but then again, the mere existence of a 'pistol' shotgun is supposed to be an AOW under fed law anyway, right?
This relates to O.C. because I would carry this loaded in a vehicle, and would fall under my CPL..
It did NOT have a buttstock, only a pistol grip, and was not designed with a buttstock.
I found the AG opinion Link which says that you can (under state law at least) cut down one of these 'pistols', as it's a pistol under state law, and not a shotgun...
BUT... where does federal law come into this? Because IIRC, a shotgun with only a pistol grip was considered to be an AOW....
It currently has an 18.5" barrel on it, but I think it'd be awesome to cut it down if I bought it, but it seems to me that it'd be in violation of federal law.. but then again, the mere existence of a 'pistol' shotgun is supposed to be an AOW under fed law anyway, right?
This relates to O.C. because I would carry this loaded in a vehicle, and would fall under my CPL..
Last edited: