Indiana Surpreme court says cops don't need permission to enter your house

This is going to be what brings blood to the streets. Some chucklehead LEO is gonna want to do "random" searches (targeted searches without RAS) and some citizen's going to get shot...oh wait...it already has:

http://azstarnet.com/news/local/crime/article_b3177522-baa0-5c9e-9f0d-d3d7da6e9e4b.html
http://reason.com/blog/2011/05/16/marine-survives-two-tours-in-i


Basically a blockwide no-knock warrant. 71 rounds fired by LEO (Marines rifle was still on "Safe"), 60 holes in the Marine with his wife and one of his children still in the house.

Wolf1477 said:

This is going to be what brings blood to the streets. Some chucklehead LEO is gonna want to do "random" searches (targeted searches without RAS) and some citizen's going to get shot...oh wait...it already has:

http://azstarnet.com/news/local/crime/article_b3177522-baa0-5c9e-9f0d-d3d7da6e9e4b.html
http://reason.com/blog/2011/05/16/marine-survives-two-tours-in-i


Basically a blockwide no-knock warrant. 71 rounds fired by LEO (Marines rifle was still on "Safe"), 60 holes in the Marine with his wife and one of his children still in the house.

Click to expand...

Milwaukees own Ed Flynn must love this stuff. Can't help but wonder if he is going to try this as well. Could only wish his is the first home "searched"...

WVCDL said:

Violations of our rights can be redressed later in court.

Click to expand...

Lets take the very recent shooting of the Marine in Arizona and move it to Indiana. Let us say the courts determined the raid was illegal. The SWAT team entered and killed the Marine as he met them with a loaded firearm.

Since the State says he can not resist illegal entry by the Police that means his widow has no Civil Case? Even though the courts decided the entry was illegal. His death was caused by his own resistance. So the violation of his and his families Constitutional Rights would in fact NOT be redressed later in court?

:question:

i probably shouldnt say this, but i dont give a damn what the authorities think they can snake past us, entry into my home without a warrant, or invitation will force me into a defensive position.

McX said:

i probably shouldnt say this, but i dont give a damn what the authorities think they can snake past us, entry into my home without a warrant, or invitation will force me into a defensive position.

Click to expand...

Your not alone my friend. This new Indiana "law of the land" is proof that we need to keep an eye open at all times.
As far as I see it, Indiana is a police state, and the people don't care enough to put a stop to this. I would not even think about any visit to the place.
If this story is all true, the Indiana Supreme Court should be replaced - TODAY - !

McX said:

i probably shouldnt say this, but i dont give a damn what the authorities think they can snake past us, entry into my home without a warrant, or invitation will force me into a defensive position.

Click to expand...

Last week the Jerry Bader Show 97.5 fm was talking about this story, He was asking for people to call in & tell him what they thought..so I called in and was put on the air ( He even used my name ) ..I said that We have rights & protections from Illegal search's that our founding fathers gave us, then I said that I would treat such any illegal entry by a police officer or any Government agent, the same way I would treat a scum bag breaking into my home...With force of Arms, yes the use of a firearm. I also added on the air if our rights continue to be slowly removed by the courts that eventually an armed uprising would occure.

Then the next caller..said something about our rights going away & revolution lol I started something


Aarons >> This entire country is a police state....

we should all used this pic as our avitars, to show, at least for a time, our position on this matter. i have, and will return to Daaaamn! later.

HandyHamlet said:

Lets take the very recent shooting of the Marine in Arizona and move it to Indiana. Let us say the courts determined the raid was illegal. The SWAT team entered and killed the Marine as he met them with a loaded firearm.

Since the State says he can not resist illegal entry by the Police that means his widow has no Civil Case? Even though the courts decided the entry was illegal. His death was caused by his own resistance. So the violation of his and his families Constitutional Rights would in fact NOT be redressed later in court?

:question:

Click to expand...

Nonsense. The Indiana Supreme Court's ruling said only that when your rights are violated, physical resistance is no longer one of your remedies, and you should instead take your case to court and not duke it out with the cop at your doorstep (or whereever else a disputed police act may occur).

So the wife could successfully sue the police in civil court for the death of her husband?