• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

I work in an off limits zone for OC. Yesterday a man entered OC. Help! Questions!

dva2

New member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
5
Location
Michigan
Thank You!

All the information provided was very insightful and educational. You guys know your stuff and that's why I posted here. As I said that was the conclusions I made upon my own research. I now know much more about this subject matter.

I read about the CPL briefly but it was a little misleading to me because of the fact being it stands for "concealed".

This is all very interesting to me and has me strongly considering exercising these rights for myself in the future.

Thank you all. :D

Edit: Sorry on the delay. I was working. I was not aware how active this forum community was.
 
Last edited:

dva2

New member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
5
Location
Michigan
Please respond educate us where you got your information?
wave2.gif

I found my information all on michigan.gov. I'm not an expert at law nor is that site very user friendly in means of conveying useful and pertinent information.

This is why I found a forum to get a better interpretation of the material.

Sometimes reading law is like translating another language. :eek:
 

dva2

New member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
5
Location
Michigan
Just one more question for me tonight.

For the sake of the discussion I would like to reveal that the establishment at which I work is a bowling alley with a casino games gambling room attached via the bar.

I'm not certain to what extent the definition of casino applies.

The games room is a separate business that leases what used to be the karaoke and bar area but is still very much homogeneous with the bowling alley.

What is the law on places such as that and does this change anything?

My curious mind will appreciate any insight.
 
Last edited:

eastmeyers

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
1,363
Location
Hazel Park, Michigan, USA
Just one more question for me tonight.

For the sake of the discussion I would like to reveal that the establishment at which I work is a bowling alley with a casino games gambling room attached via the bar.

I'm not certain to what extent the definition of casino applies.

The games room is a separate business that leases what used to be the karaoke and bar area but is still very much homogeneous with the bowling alley.

What is the law on places such as that and does this change anything?

My curious mind will appreciate any insight.

Is it an actual Casino, controlled by the state, for which the law was wrote? Its not, their are only three, Greek Town, Motor City, and MGM. OC w/CPL only IF the majority of your sales come from alcohol. OC or CC w/CPL are both fine if the majority of your sales are not alcohol. No matter how you look at it you have to have a CPL (unless you have permission from the owner or his/her agent) to carry where their is a liquor license.

Welcome to OCDO btw!
 
Last edited:

dva2

New member
Joined
May 15, 2011
Messages
5
Location
Michigan
Is it an actual Casino, controlled by the state, for which the law was wrote? Its not, their are only three, Greek Town, Motor City, and MGM.

It's not an actual casino but it is regulated by the state and they have to acquire and renew licences for the game room regularly that they have to post to the public.

Thanks for the welcome!
 

eastmeyers

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
1,363
Location
Hazel Park, Michigan, USA
It's not an actual casino but it is regulated by the state and they have to acquire and renew licences for the game room regularly that they have to post to the public.

Thanks for the welcome!
Is it an actual Casino, controlled by the state, for which the law was wrote? Its not, their are only three, Greek Town, Motor City, and MGM. OC w/CPL only IF the majority of your sales come from alcohol. OC or CC w/CPL are both fine if the majority of your sales are not alcohol. No matter how you look at it you have to have a CPL (unless you have permission from the owner or his/her agent) to carry where their is a liquor license.

Welcome to OCDO btw!

I know you are just asking for clarification, so I will just bold the part of my response that best answers your fallow up question.

The most important part for you to know, if you decide for yourself that you are going to carry, is to know what is legal where. I also explained that, in my quoted response, when it came to Liquor Licenses. When it comes to someone else carrying, I would assume (unless they are doing something dangerous) that they know the laws, and are fallowing them correctly.

Again Welcome to OCDO (Michigan)!!!
 

Bronson

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
2,126
Location
Battle Creek, Michigan, USA
Is it an actual Casino, controlled by the state, for which the law was wrote? Its not, their are only three, Greek Town, Motor City, and MGM.

Are we sure about that?

(2) An individual licensed under this act to carry a concealed pistol, or who is exempt from licensure under section 12a(1)(f), shall not carry a concealed pistol in violation of R 432.1212 or a successor rule of the Michigan administrative code promulgated under the Michigan gaming control and revenue act, 1996 IL 1, MCL 432.201 to 432.226.

R432.1212:

R 432.1212 Weapons in casino.

Rule 212.

(1) An individual may not carry a firearm or other weapon in a casino, except for the following entities:

(a) State, county, city, township, or village law enforcement officers, as defined in section 2(e) of Act No. 203 of the Public Acts of 1965, as amended, being § 28.601 et seq. of the Michigan Compiled Laws.

(b) Federal law enforcement officers, as defined in 5 U.S.C. § 8331.

(c) Armored car personnel picking up or delivering currency at secured areas.

(2) Law enforcement officers conducting official duties within a casino shall, to the extent practicable, advise the Michigan state police gaming section of their presence.

(3) Private casino security personnel may carry handcuffs while on duty in a casino.


History: 1998-2000 AACS.


The Michigan gaming control and revenue act, 1996 IL 1, MCL 432.201 to 432.226 referred to above gives this definition:

"Casino" means a building in which gaming is conducted.

It goes on to define gaming:

“Gaming” means to deal, operate, carry on, conduct, maintain or expose or offer for play any gambling game or gambling operation.

It also defines gambling game:

“Gambling game” means any game played with cards, dice, equipment or a machine, including any mechanical, electromechanical or electronic device which shall include computers and cashless wagering systems, for money, credit, or any representative of value, including, but not limited to, faro, monte, roulette, keno, bingo, fan tan, twenty one, blackjack, seven and a half, klondike, craps, poker, chuck a luck, Chinese chuck a luck (dai shu), wheel of fortune, chemin de fer, baccarat, pai gow, beat the banker, panguingui, slot machine, any banking or percentage game, or any other game or device approved by the board, but does not include games played with cards in private homes or residences in which no person makes money for operating the game, except as a player.

There are also exemptions....

432.203

(1) Casino gaming is authorized to the extent that it is conducted in accordance with this act.

(2) Except as provided in subsection (5), this act does not apply to any of the following:

(a) The pari-mutuel system of wagering used or intended to be used in connection with race meetings as authorized under the horse racing law of 1995, 1995 PA 279, MCL 431.301 to 431.336.

(b) Lottery games authorized under the McCauley-Traxler-Law-Bowman-McNeely lottery act, 1972 PA 239, MCL 432.1 to 432.47.

(c) Bingo or millionaire parties or any other activities authorized under the Traxler-McCauley-Law-Bowman bingo act, 1972 PA 382, MCL 432.101 to 432.120.

(d) Gambling on Native American land and land held in trust by the United States for a federally recognized Indian tribe on which gaming may be conducted under the Indian gaming regulatory act, Public Law 100-497, 102 Stat. 2467.

(e) Recreational card playing, bowling, redemption games, and occasional promotional activities under sections 303a, 310a, 310b, 372, and 375 of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.303a, 750.310a, 750.310b, 750.372, and 750.375.

(3) Any other law that is inconsistent with this act does not apply to casino gaming as provided for by this act.

(4) This act and rules promulgated by the board shall apply to all persons who are licensed or otherwise participate in gaming under this act.

(5) If a federal court or agency rules or federal legislation is enacted that allows a state to regulate gambling on Native American land or land held in trust by the United States for a federally recognized Indian tribe, the legislature shall enact legislation creating a new act consistent with this act to regulate casinos that are operated on Native American land or land held in trust by the United States for a federally recognized Indian tribe. The legislation shall be passed by a simple majority of members elected to and serving in each house.

It would seem that we would need to know whether the OP's place of employment is licensed under the Michigan Gaming Control and Revenue Act, in which case it might be able to be considered a casino, or either the Traxler-McCauley-Law-Bowman Bingo Act or the McCauley-Traxler-Law-Bowman-McNeely Lottery Act in which case it would be exempt from the Gaming Control Act.

Just my take.

Bronson
 

PDinDetroit

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2009
Messages
2,328
Location
SE, Michigan, USA
...
Just my take.

Bronson

Rarely have I disagreed with your take and do not do so now.

My bottom $ says that the entire building is off-limits to OC and CC due to the way the law is written and what has been described here. If this is truly the case, then the Building Owner should probably put up a sign to ensure that no Patrons get "jammed-up" over it.

dva2: Welcome to OCDO. I would suggest that you also post this question over at Michigan Gun Owners (MGO) in the Legal Beagles Forum Section. There are some lawyers there very well versed in Firearm Rights and Laws.

http://www.migunowners.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=180

http://www.migunowners.org/
 

DrTodd

Michigan Moderator
Joined
Jun 20, 2008
Messages
3,272
Location
Hudsonville , Michigan, USA
Rarely have I disagreed with your take and do not do so now.

My bottom $ says that the entire building is off-limits to OC and CC due to the way the law is written and what has been described here. If this is truly the case, then the Building Owner should probably put up a sign to ensure that no Patrons get "jammed-up" over it.

dva2: Welcome to OCDO. I would suggest that you also post this question over at Michigan Gun Owners (MGO) in the Legal Beagles Forum Section. There are some lawyers there very well versed in Firearm Rights and Laws.

http://www.migunowners.org/forum/forumdisplay.php?f=180

http://www.migunowners.org/

I disagree. I don't think that the place qualifies as a "casino" under the control of the Gaming Board. The act does give an indication that it might be considered a casino, but then lists a number of exceptions.

The law states that:
32.204a Michigan gaming control board; jurisdiction; powers.
Sec. 4a. (1) The board shall have jurisdiction over and shall supervise all gambling operations governed by this act. The board shall have all powers necessary and proper to fully and effectively execute this act, including, but not limited to, the authority to do all of the following:

(a) Investigate applicants and determine the eligibility of applicants for licenses or registration and to grant licenses to applicants in accordance with this act and the rules promulgated under this act.

(b) Have jurisdiction over and supervise casino gambling operations authorized by this act and all persons in casinos where gambling operations are conducted under this act.


That being the case, it appears that any place which is defined as a casino under this act would therefore be under the control of the gaming control board. Since the gaming control board ONLY lists the Detroit area casinos as under their control, it appears that this bowling alley/ gambling hall doesn't qualify.

The poster would know if the place was a casino under the board's control: he would have had to submit to licensing under the casino board which is a very severe process. (Yes, all employees are also licensed by the board to keep out "mob" ties)
Believe me, he would know. Most places that choose to have some sort of gaming with another activity, in this case bowling, would choose to be licensed under some other state agency, which then affords them an exemption.

The place is probably licensed under the Liquor Control Commission. If so, they are exempt from the control of the board and would not be considered a casino under the law.

Citation:
http://www.michigan.gov/mgcb
 
Last edited:

Bronson

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
2,126
Location
Battle Creek, Michigan, USA
That being the case, it appears that any place which is defined as a casino under this act would therefore be under the control of the gaming control board. Since the gaming control board ONLY lists the Detroit area casinos as under their control, it appears that this bowling alley/ gambling hall doesn't qualify.

Excellent! Good catch.

Bronson
 

eastmeyers

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
1,363
Location
Hazel Park, Michigan, USA
That being the case, it appears that any place which is defined as a casino under this act would therefore be under the control of the gaming control board. Since the gaming control board ONLY lists the Detroit area casinos as under their control, it appears that this bowling alley/ gambling hall doesn't qualify.

...(snip)...

The place is probably licensed under the Liquor Control Commission. If so, they are exempt from the control of the board and would not be considered a casino under the law.

Citation:
http://www.michigan.gov/mgcb

I have read these same points, statements, cites, and quotes, by DrTodd himself, before. That is why I felt confident before, with my statements. Thank you very much Dr. Todd for providing them again, I would have drugged though and found them myself, but when I came back to check up you had already done so. Thank you DrTodd.

I do hope this clears up the reason I thought what I thought.

To the OP, FYI this may come off as bickering on this thread, but honestly it is not, not in the least, it is great minds coming together, to offer opinions, and find facts. Please stick around!
 
Last edited:

Bronson

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2008
Messages
2,126
Location
Battle Creek, Michigan, USA
To the OP, FYI this may come off as bickering on this thread, but honestly it is not, not in the least, it is great minds coming together, to offer opinions, and find facts. Please stick around!

Yes, this.

For most of us this is where we hash out ideas and compare notes on our individual researches into the law. I actually want other people to poke holes in things I find. I want them to say "nope, you've got it all wrong" and then offer proof of their assertions. It is through doing so that we all learn more.

Bronson
 
Top