KeepShootin
Regular Member
If an LEO gets upset at OC or recording it makes you wonder why they wanted the badge in the first place. Actually, I know.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hkcZilKChI
Rofl. So true!
If an LEO gets upset at OC or recording it makes you wonder why they wanted the badge in the first place. Actually, I know.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7hkcZilKChI
Rofl. So true!
Like I said, I think he did it right!
But, unimpugnable is a high standard. The problem is that we have gun owners who claim to support RKBA who think that Mr. Fiorino was out of line because they have become predisposed to believe that open carriers go out looking to cause a confrontation.
Like this guy:
[video=youtube;1SHHW8DwYBs]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1SHHW8DwYBs[/video]
He was actually video taping his own girlfriend's traffic stop but that is not how the video comes across at the beginning.
"12 states forbid the recording of conversations without the consent of all parties. They are California, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, Pennsylvania and Washington. "
http://www.wingfieldaudio.com/surreptitious-recording.html
Pennsylvania: Pa. Stat. Ann. Tit 21 Section 351 (Purdon 1955)
http://www.callcorder.com/phone-recording-law-america.htm
Read,Learn,Weep.
The End -on that topic.
Just because one can cite to source does not mean that source is accurate.
The laws are what the laws are. Not wanting them to be so..changes nothing.
Ignoring the resulting case law doesn't make it cease to be, either.