Captain Nemo
Regular Member
The judiciary committee vote was as expected 3 - 2 for passage of SB93 as amended.
Risser and Erpanbach took a play out of the old playbook "If you can't convince them with facts, dazzle them with b## S###. Something the anti's are quite skillful at.
I guess he listen to all the public testimony when this was being heard.All Erpanbach did was waste everyones time, he just wanted to hear his own voice all afternoon as he is in love with himself ! Erpenbach said, all the polls he has seen say that the Majority wants training ?????? What polls are these ? And Risser, that old fart needs to go.
I wonder when this will be schedualed for a floor vote in the senate ??
i wont get excited until i see true Constitutional Carry, and their bogus cant do this, and cant do that's are removed. this bill is a rail job to a permit. buy it or wish you had, from the comfort of some jail cell.
Steve, as it is written, WI won't send you to jail for carrying in a GFSZ without a permit, it is a 'forfeiture', basically, a traffic ticket and you forfeit some money. Without a permit, you would go to Federal prison, however, until WCI is successful with their lawsuit.
I agree with you that we need it fixed, however, no matter what WI does, we can't get around the permit requirement for the Federal GFSZ. I specifically talked to the NRA lobbyist about the language MY had inserted in their law to get around it and he said that it wouldn't stand court muster.
the problem for me is you are issued something. you get a ticket, whatever, you are labelled as violating the law, while the permit holder is some how above me?!!! i'd say too you rack up enough of those fines, and magically your permit will get yanked. i 'spect you to have my bail money ready.
the problem for me is you are issued something. you get a ticket, whatever, you are labelled as violating the law, while the permit holder is some how above me?!!! i'd say too you rack up enough of those fines, and magically your permit will get yanked. i 'spect you to have my bail money ready.
I just quickly scanned SB93 and the 'super amendment' and find no reference to churches/places of worship.
What you might of heard was that Erpenback and/or Risser offered an amendment (or two) to add all sorts of exceptions. They were voted down. Maybe one of them had churches.
We really need to see the 'clean' (sorry McX) version of the bill that will be put into the full Senate.
https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/related/amendments/sb93
has the amendments. SSA1-SB93 passed, SA1-SSA1-SB93 failed, SA2-SSA1-SB93 failed, SA3-SSA1-SB93 passed, SA4-SSA1-SB93 passed.
SA2 had the church and other prohibited places.