NHCGRPR45
Regular Member
A nicely slanted view from the Anti's.
http://thesouthend.wayne.edu/index.php/article/2011/05/oped_what_gun_control
http://thesouthend.wayne.edu/index.php/article/2011/05/oped_what_gun_control
This reads as if written by a HS student oh wait it almost was. The article is poorly written and reads like a 1st year english paper.
It looks like she's a fourth-year at wayne, which explains the lack of "methodical" cold-heartedness, among other things .
My guess is that she got stuck with the topic. I've noticed that there seems to be a pattern where the younger, less seasoned journalists get the "NRA is evil" stories...maybe because the editors figure they are formulaic and easier to write? either way, i wouldn't be surprised if she attended an OC picnic...
i wouldn't be surprised if she attended an OC picnic...
The idea isn't to go back to being subservient to the Royal Crown.... the idea is those who think the Constitution is irrelevant want to make everyone subservient to them!Quote: "They believe that it is okay to bear arms because it is in the Constitution, but in today’s society, is the Second Amendment of the Constitution still relevant?": endquote
Irrespective of the poor grammar in this article, this one line sent chills down my spine. Now we are to decide what is relevant or not in the Constitution and its Amendments? Maybe we need to reevaluate the Declaration of Independence as well. After all, society has changed over the last 200+ years. Maybe we should go back to being subservient to the Royal Crown. It is thinking like this that make me fear for the future of this great nation.