Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: SB93 Amendment 2

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Greendale, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    42

    SB93 Amendment 2

    https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/201...1_sb93/_000018

    May 25, 2011 − Offered by Senators RISSER and ERPENBACH.

    I had both amendment 1 and 2 up side by side. If I read the amendment 2 correctly, they want to impose more restrictions and remove other lines that gave us a little more freedom. You may want to do the same and compare the two.
    Last edited by dmworken; 05-29-2011 at 11:48 PM.

  2. #2
    Regular Member Motofixxer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Somewhere over the Rainbow
    Posts
    972
    WOW I don't have enough room to describe all the problems with that amendment. They are trying to override private property rights of nonprofits, home daycare, medical clinics, private business.
    Click Here for New to WI Open Carry Legal References and Informational Videos--- FAQ's http://Tinyurl.com/OpenCarry-WI

    The Armed Badger A WI site dedicated to Concealed Carry in WI

    "To disarm the people... was the best and most effectual way to enslave them." -- George Mason, Speech of June 14, 1788

    http://Tinyurl.com/New-To-Guns to DL useful Info

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Greendale, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    42
    Although there are only two people senators asking for this amendment, we need to make sure that Galloway and the others does not accept it.

  4. #4
    Wisconsin Carry, Inc. Shotgun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    Madison, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    2,668
    That amendment did not pass in the committee, voted down 3-2. When the bill goes before the full Senate there can be new attempts to amendments. We'll have to watch carefully.
    A. Gold

    Failure to comply may result in discipline up to and including termination.
    The free man is a warrior. - Nietzsche "Twilight of the Idols"

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Greendale, Wisconsin, USA
    Posts
    42
    Very well. Was there a post that I missed or was the outcome shared somewhere else? Thanks for the information.

    I do agree that we have to watch the bill carefully.

  6. #6
    Regular Member paul@paul-fisher.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Chandler, AZ
    Posts
    4,047
    Quote Originally Posted by dmworken View Post
    https://docs.legis.wisconsin.gov/201...1_sb93/_000018

    May 25, 2011 − Offered by Senators RISSER and ERPENBACH.

    I had both amendment 1 and 2 up side by side. If I read the amendment 2 correctly, they want to impose more restrictions and remove other lines that gave us a little more freedom. You may want to do the same and compare the two.
    Please read the history here: http://legis.wisconsin.gov/2011/data/SB93hst.html It will show that SA1-SSA1-SB93 and SA2-SSA1-SB93 were voted down. SSA1, SA3 and SA4 were passed. So.... to read the bill at it stands now, you need to amend SSA1 with SA3 and SA4 and the amend SB93 with SSA1.

    I know it's confusing but that is the way it works.

  7. #7
    McX
    Guest
    I am concerned that none of the proposed, or updated bills bear the words: SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.

    (there is also no mention of cheeseburgers either)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •