I replied on FB, will add some thoughts here...
:arrow:1) a church is private property, so they don't have any obligation to recognize your rights & you have no recourse other than not giving them money. (Thank goodness the church is not a gov't entity!!!)
Go ahead & point out the conflict between expecting to exercise their 1A right while denying your 2A right. Hypocritical of them.
Using scriptural examples could be useful & other people have given you lots.
They're running on fear & emotion, not logic, so you have to figure out a way to both make them see the stupidity of their position (a policy will stop a criminal from committing murder) AND make them more afraid of being vulnerable.
Making themselves more vulnerable will not stop a criminal.
:arrow:2) their concern, or rather the concern of the sheeple who have caused this mess, is likely to be based on fear for their safety.
They fear that you will harm them.
Even if they won't admit that, they fear that someone carrying a gun will harm them.
They hold the illogical belief that putting up a sign or making a policy will stop this potential harm.
I'd counter this by pointing out that criminals don't follow laws, & someone who's willing to rob or murder certainly won't be bothered by a church policy.
DO NOT say anything about a "sign on the door"!!!
Here's why:
a) if they don't post it, they'll have to tell each carrier they see that they're not welcome.
b) without posting, once CC is legal you can carry concealed.
c) they could actually read SB93 & meet the signage requirements, then nobody could carry there.
You could point out that laws & policies didn't stop massacres at VA Tech, NIU, Columbine, or the Brookfield church, but an armed parishoner who had volunteered to act as security that day stopped a murderer from killing people in Colorado Springs.
Also point out that if nobody is armed, the criminal intent on mass murder has control.
Find out what the average response time for police is in Racine.
That should scare them.
:arrow:3) It might be worth mentioning that unless there are metal detectors, anyone can ignore the church policy.
By requiring members to be defenseless, then not protecting them from criminals who will have ill intent, the church is increasing its liability. How good is their insurance?