davegran
Regular Member
IPSC is another one.
There are other shooting groups that sponsor competitions.
Heck, I know of 2 at the range I use, & there's IDPA, GSSF, & several other acronyms I'm spacing on at the moment.
I do not see anyone bashing NRA. It's more of a "whodunnit" question. Who did NRA negotiate with in the legislature, under the radar, to arrive at what was added to SB93? Which of our legislators said "this is the minimum that we will accept"? This did not simply happen overnight and nobody that I was speaking with had any inkling that this negotiation was taking place.
I could care less if the GOP loses Darling now. B*tch...
I agree. Shoot for the stars, land on the moon, move on from there.Flipper said:Without the NRA coming out as hard as they did for no permit - no training, we would have ended up with the old PPA with the Flynn Firearm Felony Act as part of it
Or an NRA class, or point people to the Maryland State Police firearms safety class.Flipper said:Inform everyone you know with a hunter's safety certificate or military service how simple it is to obtain a carry permit. Strength in numbers, and potential WCI members.
Some day you may need a vote from a less than pure member to stave off something really bad. Considering both of the bills that passed under Doyle weren't nearly as good as this one (and everybody was sooo excited when it appeared they might get through on an override) let's stop foaming at the mouth and appreciate the progress. SB93 (as amended) ain't law yet. There might be some members of the assembly that say - "These guys are going to go after me even if I'm 95% with them - I might as well go 50% and pick up some support on the left." This is holding your breath until you turn blue stuff. Tantrums are for 2 year old children. "I want everything and I want it NOW!" isn't pretty when done by unionistas. It's just as unattractive here.