Results 1 to 2 of 2

Thread: NATO versus Anonymous

  1. #1
    Regular Member VW_Factor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Leesburg, GA

    NATO versus Anonymous

    Not sure if anyone follows Anon at all. What do you guys think of this?

    Article :

    Press Release :

  2. #2
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
    What do I think?

    I think it sounds like NATO is putting forth veiled threats for "conventional military strikes" in response to exercises involving freedom of speech.

    It sounds like NATO opposes the 1st Amendment of the U.S. Constitution.

    It sounds like it's time for NATO to be disbanded for grossly overstepping the bounds of their charter and adversely interfering in the internal affairs of other law-abiding countries, with threats towards the law-abiding citizens of those countries.

    I'm sure NATO will disagree. However, if it agreed, it wouldn't be breaking the law like this in the first place. If I made such a threat against my neighbor, I'd be in jail for quite a while.

    Thus, it's sounds like the leaders of NATO need to do some hard time to fit their hard crimes.
    Last edited by since9; 06-15-2011 at 08:44 PM.
    The First protects the Second, and the Second protects the First. OO-RAH!!! Together, they protect the rest of our Bill of Rights and other founding documents.

    As for President Trump, he's getting the job done.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts