Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Throwaway guns!?

  1. #1
    Regular Member Badger Johnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,217

    Throwaway guns!?

    http://www.guns.com/throw-away-weapo...-of-power.html

    From a LEO who posted that story...
    'So what were those aforementioned preparations put in place by some very well-meaning veteran officers? Well, many, if not most, carried, what became known as, “throw-away weapons.”'

    I had no idea most LEOs carried throw-away weapons.
    A gun in a holster is better than one drawn and dispensing bullets. Concealed forces the latter. - ixtow

    Hi, I'm hypercritical. But I mean no harm, I just like to try to look deeply at life

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fairborn, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    13,063
    Likely because most probably don't.

    That article is so full of the myths perpetuated by TV and the movies that I strongly doubt the veracity of anything the article purports.

  3. #3
    Regular Member Fallschirmjäger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    Georgia, USA
    Posts
    3,915


    I can't wait until the next installment, where we learn about the magic beans.

  4. #4
    Founder's Club Member thebigsd's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Quarryville, PA
    Posts
    3,543
    I would say that this article is full of it. While a very small minority of officers might do this I think the vast majority do not. It poses a huge risk to them in several ways.
    "When seconds count between living or dying, the police are only minutes away."

  5. #5
    Regular Member Dreamer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Location
    Grennsboro NC
    Posts
    5,358
    Not to mention that the author admits to having owned (and still owns) several of these weapons. And if HIS "throw-away weapons" are in line with the ones he describes in his article, possession of them is a FEDERAL OFFENSE, because it is against the law to be in possession of a firearm that has had the serial number intentionally modified or removed...

    Somebody should report this guy to the BATFE and the FBI, because his article is essentially an admission to violating Federal law...
    It is our cause to dispel the foggy thinking which avoids hard decisions in the delusion that a world of conflict will somehow mysteriously resolve itself into a world of harmony, if we just don't rock the boat or irritate the forces of aggression—and this is hogwash."
    --Barry Goldwater, 1964

  6. #6
    Regular Member SpyderTattoo's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Kent, Washington, USA
    Posts
    1,018
    That gun, the cops lay down like that, is referred to as a "Ham Sandwich"


    "Holy $hit! that perp you just shot didn't really have a gun! Better lay down the ham-sandwich"
    Certified Glock Armorer

    "A government and its agents are under no general duty to provide public services, such as police protection, to any particular individual citizen..." -- Warren v. District of Columbia, 444 A.2d 1 (D.C. App.181)

    A 1911 that works properly is as rare as a Glock that doesn't.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •