...are being monitored by a visiting group that dwarfs members numbers by at least three to one. The number of people who post this anti private property rights crap are out numbered by far more than that by other members. Stop and look at the numbers of your "infringement group", and you will see this to be a fact. I, for one want you to stop using this form, or at least the word "WE", in your campaign against the rights of others. This fine for me and the hell with you will not be tolerated by true advocates of the constitution. Should we be able to post "NO CARRY IN...", absolutely, it better serves the cause, and we will know how to plan our daily activities. All that is being done now is damaging to everyone. boar out.
...,and as far as infringement, "THOSE WHO INFRINGE UPON ARE RIGHTS". Private property, and business rights are protected under SB93,like it or not. boar out. :idea:
So, what's your point? That's what I'm trying to figure out.
heck I am all for private property owners being able to say NO YOU MAY NOT carry this or that on to my property ! This is still America ( kinda ) . I also 100% all for people being able to say WE ARE NOT GOING TO DO BUSINESS WITH YOU because you won't allow US to bring a legally carried concealed weapon into your business for our personal self defense. We all make choices & we are free to make those choices BUT when your choice infringes on my rights..THEN i have a right to spend my money elsewhere.
Wild Boar...your Paranoia is now visually evident & I could careless about somewhen unseen & un known infringement group.....I agree TIN FOIL ALERT !!!!
umm yeah..and you need to spell your words correctly....OUR is not ARE ((("THOSE WHO INFRINGE UPON ARE RIGHTS". ))) i almost replied WTF are you attempting to say ??!!
OK, I am posting a new rule on the WI hometown forum...no posting when either DRUNK or HIGH as your posts sound like they are being made by an intoxicated person...YOUR RANTING ABOUT UNKNOWN GROUPS that we all could give two flying $HITS LESS ABOUT.
Sorry WEBSTER, I'm not perfect,(removing a layer of foil),and am not alone in that respect. RANTING = STATEMENT, when you're out of ammo you attack, not very wise. boar out. :idea:
But...but, isn't ammo's role; "The purpose of ammunition is predominantly to project force against a selected target". -Wiki-
View attachment 6134
So, what's your point? That's what I'm trying to figure out.
...I did not quot the thread correctly, It's, STORES who infringe, not THOSE. boar out.
We can't pick and choose which Constitutional Rights we support, well at least I can't. A man has a right to post his private property. I have a right to carry for any lawful purpose. My right to carry stops at his property line whether we like it our not.
Personally I don't have a problem with it. I want to be the one who decides who can come onto my property armed.