Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Ever been detained, arrested, or prosecuted for violating a preempted ordinance?

  1. #1
    Regular Member Rich7553's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SWFL
    Posts
    516

    Exclamation Ever been detained, arrested, or prosecuted for violating a preempted ordinance?

    Florida Carry's legal team needs your help. If you have ever (since 1987) been detained, arrested, or prosecuted for violating a local ordinance in Florida that regulates firearms, we want to know about it.

    Briefly describe where, when, what happened, and final disposition to rich@floridacarry.org. If you have any questions, please contact me at the e-mail address supplied. Identifying information will remain confidential and will not be released to third parties outside of Florida Carry without your consent.

    Thank you for your assistance.
    Rich
    MSgt, USAF Ret.
    Executive Director
    Florida Carry, Inc.
    www.floridacarry.org
    Glock 23 RTF2
    Mosin Nagant M91/30 (1942 Izhevsk)
    _____________________________________
    Want to do something about your gun rights?
    PITCH IN, QUIT B*TCHING!

  2. #2
    Founder's Club Member ixtow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Suwannee County, FL
    Posts
    5,069
    Not for a real one, no. Made up "Opinion Enforcement," yes.
    "The fourth man's dark, accusing song had scratched our comfort hard and long..."
    http://edhelper.com/poetry/The_Hangm...rice_Ogden.htm

    https://gunthreadadapters.com

    "Be not intimidated ... nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your Liberties by any pretense of Politeness, Delicacy, or Decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for Hypocrisy, Chicanery, and Cowardice." - John Adams

    Tyranny with Manners is still Tyranny.

  3. #3
    Regular Member Rich7553's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SWFL
    Posts
    516
    Quote Originally Posted by ixtow View Post
    Not for a real one, no. Made up "Opinion Enforcement," yes.
    Unfortunately, I don't think that's going to help the intented goal.
    Rich
    MSgt, USAF Ret.
    Executive Director
    Florida Carry, Inc.
    www.floridacarry.org
    Glock 23 RTF2
    Mosin Nagant M91/30 (1942 Izhevsk)
    _____________________________________
    Want to do something about your gun rights?
    PITCH IN, QUIT B*TCHING!

  4. #4
    Founder's Club Member ixtow's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    Suwannee County, FL
    Posts
    5,069
    Quote Originally Posted by Rich7553 View Post
    Unfortunately, I don't think that's going to help the intented goal.
    Yeah, the thread looked lonely...
    "The fourth man's dark, accusing song had scratched our comfort hard and long..."
    http://edhelper.com/poetry/The_Hangm...rice_Ogden.htm

    https://gunthreadadapters.com

    "Be not intimidated ... nor suffer yourselves to be wheedled out of your Liberties by any pretense of Politeness, Delicacy, or Decency. These, as they are often used, are but three different names for Hypocrisy, Chicanery, and Cowardice." - John Adams

    Tyranny with Manners is still Tyranny.

  5. #5
    Regular Member Rich7553's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    SWFL
    Posts
    516
    Quote Originally Posted by ixtow View Post
    Yeah, the thread looked lonely...
    One of our legal team requested the info. I suppose he's looking for a poster boy somewhere.
    Rich
    MSgt, USAF Ret.
    Executive Director
    Florida Carry, Inc.
    www.floridacarry.org
    Glock 23 RTF2
    Mosin Nagant M91/30 (1942 Izhevsk)
    _____________________________________
    Want to do something about your gun rights?
    PITCH IN, QUIT B*TCHING!

  6. #6
    Founder's Club Member Jojo712's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Miami, FL
    Posts
    201
    Would "actual harm" be a pre-requisite for legal standing in a case like this, or simply a nice example to obtain damages for the victim of the pre-empted ordinance?

  7. #7
    Regular Member rvrctyrngr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    SE of DiSOrDEr, ,
    Posts
    363
    Quote Originally Posted by Jojo712 View Post
    Would "actual harm" be a pre-requisite for legal standing in a case like this, or simply a nice example to obtain damages for the victim of the pre-empted ordinance?
    The statute was written to provide standing without actual harm, JoJo. As you state, any actual harm would be grounds to seek damages in the suit.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •