stainless1911
Banned
Already happened, could happen again.
detroit_fan said:wasn't meant to be funny. it's very possible a judge with an agenda or one that lets personal beliefs guide their decision could rule against us.DanM said:Your jokes aren't good. Don't quit your day job.
detroit_fan said:the cadl case has a good chance to end ALL OC in MI.
Judges giving bad rulings based on agenda or personal beliefs happens all the time. That is a fact.
Facts are different than predictions. Predictions like:
I agree with your fact about judges. I do not agree with your prediction. If it's not a bad joke, it's even worse as a straight-faced prediction.
Here's a prediction much more likely to be true: the CADL case has little to zero chance to end ALL OC in MI.
I'm intrigued... would you mind explaining your thought processes as to how if OC is declared to be the crime of brandishing there would still be a way to legally OC?Judges giving bad rulings based on agenda or personal beliefs happens all the time. That is a fact.
Facts are different than predictions. Predictions like:
I agree with your fact about judges. I do not agree with your prediction. If it's not a bad joke, it's even worse as a straight-faced prediction.
Here's a prediction much more likely to be true: the CADL case has little to zero chance to end ALL OC in MI.
They would have to take the meaning of brandish-to wave or flourish about menacingly,and consider a gun in a holster to be waving or flourishing.Gun in holster-no movement or activity,gun waving and flourishing in hand-movement and activity.CADL has asked that OC be considered brandishing. Since it is going to be decided at the appeals level, if the judge decides that OC is brandishing, it could become case law.
They would first have to go through MCRGO v. Ferndale to eliminate Possession.There are precedents on possession up the wazzoo!I'm intrigued... would you mind explaining your thought processes as to how if OC is declared to be the crime of brandishing there would still be a way to legally OC?
They would have to take the meaning of brandish-to wave or flourish about menacingly,and consider a gun in a holster to be waving or flourishing.Gun in holster-no movement or activity,gun waving and flourishing in hand-movement and activity.
They would first have to go through MCRGO v. Ferndale to eliminate Possession.There are precedents on possession up the wazzoo!
The question is how do you call a gun possessed in a holster brandishing by any of the definitions and precedents?With the respect you know I have for you and your posts....
May I suggest going here:
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/brandish
and read all the definitions of the word "brandish"........
Please tell me how "possession" would change the definitions of "brandish"?
wasn't meant to be funny. it's very possible a judge with an agenda or one that lets personal beliefs guide their decision could rule against us.
Incoming PM.The question is how do you call a gun possessed in a holster brandishing by any of the definitions and precedents?
I'm intrigued... would you mind explaining your thought processes as to how if OC is declared to be the crime of brandishing there would still be a way to legally OC?