• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

My resolution for the troll

Flipper

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
1,140
Location
, Wisconsin, USA
The red ones have already been banned from Planet 10. Where is munchboxables supposed to go? She has no home.

come-at-me-bro-turtle.jpg

Don't turtles carry salmonella?. Hope the person holding the little feller/gal didn't lick their fingers immediately after.
 
Last edited:

M-Taliesin

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2011
Messages
1,504
Location
Aurora, Colorado
Perhaps you might read the initial post of this thread. No slip, no guilt. Initial post gives specific names. MO

Howdy!
I'm still confused. You didn't quote the initial post, so it appears that you did quote another that you didn't have an issue with to make an issue of things? I don't get it. Why would you quote another post that isn't offensive to express your offense about a totally different post? That makes about as much sense as opening a box of eggs with a weed wacker. No names given in the post you quoted but you're offended about a different post that evidently implicated you, but you didn't quote that one. Three card monte, electronic style.

Blessings,
M-Taliesin
 

apjonas

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2006
Messages
1,157
Location
, ,
Not That it is or is not the Case Here

But this thread inspired me to comment thusly:

Please remember that "troll" and its derivatives has (or at least at one time) had a specific meaning(s). Not every post that prompts an emotional reaction and certainly not every post that a person (or group) disagrees with qualifies. I always think an essential element is the goal of undermining the exchange of ideas or hurting someone. So to be fair, the exact same comment may or may not be trolling depending upon intent. I recall an anecdote from William F. Buckley that said something like "When you compare the man who pushes an old lady into the path of an oncoming bus and the man who pushes an old lady out of the path of an oncoming bus - the fact that both pushed an old lady is not the operative distinction." I have been the recipient of the casually flung troll label on many occasions, even if (1) I take great pains to explain my position and (2) nobody disputes that it is sincerely held. Too many times, expressing a thought that is in opposition, however slightly, with the party line (groupthink) is deemed good and sufficient reason to smear somebody with the trollbrush. The whys and wherefores of this phenomenon would be the stuff of a dissertation but it has much to do with wanting to belong to a group/acceptance. There have been a few times when people have communicated with me privately to say that their public denouncement wasn't their real feeling and/or they agreed with me - but fear ruled the day. Proclaiming Troll! can be no different than calling a person Nazi! or Racist! just because he doesn't support Obamacare or says something complimentary about Michele Bachmann. Often it is merely a tool to stifle legitimate debate. Just something to consider.
 
Last edited:

M-Taliesin

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2011
Messages
1,504
Location
Aurora, Colorado
But this thread inspired me to comment thusly:
<Snip>
Too many times, expressing a thought that is in opposition, however slightly, with the party line (groupthink) is deemed good and sufficient reason to smear somebody with the trollbrush.
<Snip>
Often it is merely a tool to stifle legitimate debate. Just something to consider.

Howdy Amigo!
That's the most lucid and well thought out post I've read all day. The only addition I'd throw in along with calling somebody a Nazi, Racist and similar tripe to stifle legitimate debate is the branding of others as "libtard", "socialist", "Marxist", leftist and similar 'branding'. Some can't disagree without an emotional need to resort to name calling. All intended to stifle legitimate debate. Usually because somebody disagrees with the "party line" or group gestalt! You pointed out something elemental in the character of some folks who resort to that particular tactic when somebody else refused to march in lock-step to their particular paradigm.

Wow, your post blew me away this morning. Well said pardner! Well said!

Blessings,
M-Taliesin
 

M-Taliesin

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2011
Messages
1,504
Location
Aurora, Colorado
Who hasnt done that? ... :-D

Howdy Mlutz!
Oh, thanks a bunch. Now I gotta wipe coffee off my monitor!
On the bright side, my nasal passages are nicely cleaned out!

That being said, thanks for the laugh amigo!

Blessings,
M-Taliesin
 
Last edited:

M-Taliesin

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2011
Messages
1,504
Location
Aurora, Colorado
i bit.... and i'm still chewing.

Nice :cool:

Howdy Pard!
Well, ya gotta admit... there just ain't hardly any good cowbell solos these days.
It's a dying art form, doncha know. And begs the question:
Where will tomorrow's cowbell soloists come from?

At least the guy in question knew how to rock out on a cowbell!

Blessings,
M-Taliesin
 

HandyHamlet

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
2,772
Location
Terra, Sol
but this thread inspired me to comment thusly:

Please remember that "troll" and its derivatives has (or at least at one time) had a specific meaning(s). Not every post that prompts an emotional reaction and certainly not every post that a person (or group) disagrees with qualifies. I always think an essential element is the goal of undermining the exchange of ideas or hurting someone. So to be fair, the exact same comment may or may not be trolling depending upon intent. I recall an anecdote from william f. Buckley that said something like "when you compare the man who pushes an old lady into the path of an oncoming bus and the man who pushes an old lady out of the path of an oncoming bus - the fact that both pushed an old lady is not the operative distinction." i have been the recipient of the casually flung troll label on many occasions, even if (1) i take great pains to explain my position and (2) nobody disputes that it is sincerely held. Too many times, expressing a thought that is in opposition, however slightly, with the party line (groupthink) is deemed good and sufficient reason to smear somebody with the trollbrush. The whys and wherefores of this phenomenon would be the stuff of a dissertation but it has much to do with wanting to belong to a group/acceptance. There have been a few times when people have communicated with me privately to say that their public denouncement wasn't their real feeling and/or they agreed with me - but fear ruled the day. Proclaiming troll! Can be no different than calling a person nazi! Or racist! Just because he doesn't support obamacare or says something complimentary about michele bachmann. Often it is merely a tool to stifle legitimate debate. Just something to consider.



troll!
 

Trip20

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
526
Location
Wausau Area
But this thread inspired me to comment thusly:

Please remember that "troll" and its derivatives has (or at least at one time) had a specific meaning(s). Not every post that prompts an emotional reaction and certainly not every post that a person (or group) disagrees with qualifies. I always think an essential element is the goal of undermining the exchange of ideas or hurting someone. So to be fair, the exact same comment may or may not be trolling depending upon intent. I recall an anecdote from William F. Buckley that said something like "When you compare the man who pushes an old lady into the path of an oncoming bus and the man who pushes an old lady out of the path of an oncoming bus - the fact that both pushed an old lady is not the operative distinction." I have been the recipient of the casually flung troll label on many occasions, even if (1) I take great pains to explain my position and (2) nobody disputes that it is sincerely held. Too many times, expressing a thought that is in opposition, however slightly, with the party line (groupthink) is deemed good and sufficient reason to smear somebody with the trollbrush. The whys and wherefores of this phenomenon would be the stuff of a dissertation but it has much to do with wanting to belong to a group/acceptance. There have been a few times when people have communicated with me privately to say that their public denouncement wasn't their real feeling and/or they agreed with me - but fear ruled the day. Proclaiming Troll! can be no different than calling a person Nazi! or Racist! just because he doesn't support Obamacare or says something complimentary about Michele Bachmann. Often it is merely a tool to stifle legitimate debate. Just something to consider.

Allow me to introduce you to the enter key.
Click the picture for more information.



:p
 
Top