logables
Regular Member
But this thread inspired me to comment thusly:
Please remember that "troll" and its derivatives has (or at least at one time) had a specific meaning(s). Not every post that prompts an emotional reaction and certainly not every post that a person (or group) disagrees with qualifies. I always think an essential element is the goal of undermining the exchange of ideas or hurting someone. So to be fair, the exact same comment may or may not be trolling depending upon intent. I recall an anecdote from William F. Buckley that said something like "When you compare the man who pushes an old lady into the path of an oncoming bus and the man who pushes an old lady out of the path of an oncoming bus - the fact that both pushed an old lady is not the operative distinction." I have been the recipient of the casually flung troll label on many occasions, even if (1) I take great pains to explain my position and (2) nobody disputes that it is sincerely held. Too many times, expressing a thought that is in opposition, however slightly, with the party line (groupthink) is deemed good and sufficient reason to smear somebody with the trollbrush. The whys and wherefores of this phenomenon would be the stuff of a dissertation but it has much to do with wanting to belong to a group/acceptance. There have been a few times when people have communicated with me privately to say that their public denouncement wasn't their real feeling and/or they agreed with me - but fear ruled the day. Proclaiming Troll! can be no different than calling a person Nazi! or Racist! just because he doesn't support Obamacare or says something complimentary about Michele Bachmann. Often it is merely a tool to stifle legitimate debate. Just something to consider.
Excellent post. MO