carry for myself
Regular Member
good thing it was just a finger gun...................i would have glanced at my sidearm. looked at his finger and just said "mines bigger" and walked away haha +1 on how you handled it
Since no one else went there...
"You should have shot him."
If only to raise the collective IQ of the species.
He apparently was trying to provoke a shooting.SnarlyWino said:Escalated to what? He was a smart-ass being a smart-ass.
...Would he have picked a fight with an armed man? Not likely.
Hadn't thought of that, but it's good.Badger Johnson said:I would have called 9-11 and said "a man (description), threatened to shoot me, not sure if he had a weapon, he verbalized it", and give location.
I would have called 9-11 and said "a man (description), threatened to shoot me, not sure if he had a weapon, he verbalized it", and give location. I probably would have demanded the guy's name and/or watched to see if he got in a car and get his license plate #.
You did fine. Especially sizing the guy up. Good on you.
But, really, the guy was no threat to you. And no threat means no response involving threat of deadly force is warranted.
If you were to have pulled out the ole pistola, a lot would have been different. Probably bad. Mostly bad for you.
You did fine.
Actually it makes no difference whether the assailant represented an actual threat. What's important is whether the defender had a good faith belief, based on objective fact, that he was being presented with an imminent threat of serious bodily injury. If the OP in this case had shot the assailant dead, I believe I could have represented him effectively. However, it's a close call, and (remove lawyer hat, put on personal protection instructor hat) this kind of situation is why one has to remember to find cover, or at least concealment, first; then think about shooting. I like to think I'd have dived behind the car without a second's hesitation.
However, what the assailant did was both a crime and an intentionally wrongful act ("tort"). I'd file suit and subpoena the surveillance video toute-de-suite. Find out who that guy is and show up at the magistrate's office. Assault is making someone think you're going to touch them in an offensive manner; battery is the touching itself. This was a case of assault, no question, the assailant could get 12 months in jail plus a $2500 fine.
I think something is up in Allegheny County. Someone is pushing anti-gun stuff there, and I wouldn't be surprised if this guy was part of a local group trying to get gun-totin' folks arrested.
"Brandishing" with a finger can be a serious offense if you know Skidmark's story. (a complete and utter stupidity) You should have had him arrested.......lol
I think something is up in Allegheny County. Someone is pushing anti-gun stuff there, and I wouldn't be surprised if this guy was part of a local group trying to get gun-totin' folks arrested.
SkidMarks situation is utterly ridiculous and I will not lower my standards to those who do these things against the citizens who pay their wages and whom they work for. :lol:
Since this makes the second time it's been referenced, and I'm not familiar with this "SkidMark"'s tale - Throw me a link?