The implication here is that you have to have a CPL from another state to OC in Michigan, is that correct?
From your home state, YES.
If you live in Ohio and have a PA license you're a no go in Michigan.
For concealed carry, but not for OC. If you have a CPL from a state other than your own, you can possess a handgun and OC in Michigan. Janet Kukuk law.
(h) Purchasing, owning, carrying, possessing, using, or transporting an antique firearm. As used in this
subdivision, "antique firearm" means that term as defined in section 231a of the Michigan penal code, 1931
PA 328, MCL 750.231a.
(2) The amendatory act that added subsection (1)(h) shall be known and may be cited as the "Janet Kukuk
act".
Now I'm a bit confused...
Can a non-resident OPEN Carry w/o ANY permit/license, whatever? Or is a non-resident required to have a CPL of some sort to OPEN carry?
Cite's please..
(8) An individual who is not a resident of this state is not required to obtain a license under this section if all of the following conditions apply:
(a) The individual is licensed in his or her state of residence to purchase, carry, or transport a pistol.
(b) The individual is in possession of the license described in subdivision (a).
(c) The individual is the owner of the pistol he or she possesses, carries, or transports.
(d) The individual possesses the pistol for a lawful purpose as that term is defined in section 231a of the Michigan penal code, 1931 PA 328, MCL 750.231a.
28.432 Inapplicability of MCL 28.422; amendatory act as “Janet Kukuk act”.
Sec. 12.
(1) Section 2 (Section 2 is 28.422 cited above, Bronson) does not apply to any of the following:
. . .
(f) A United States citizen holding a license to carry a pistol concealed upon his or her person issued by another state.
(2) A person shall not carry a pistol concealed on or about his or her person, or, whether concealed or otherwise, in a vehicle operated or occupied by the person, except in his or her dwelling house, place of business, or on other land possessed by the person, without a license to carry the pistol as provided by law and if licensed, shall not carry the pistol in a place or manner inconsistent with any restrictions upon such license.
750.231a Exceptions to MCL 750.227(2); definitions.
Sec. 231a.
(1) Subsection (2) of section 227 does not apply to any of the following:
(a) To a person holding a valid license to carry a pistol concealed upon his or her person issued by his or her state of residence except where the pistol is carried in nonconformance with a restriction appearing on the license.
Or am I misreading the last paragraph?
Wow... And I understand now.
MI requires some sort of documentation, whether it's a license to purchase (as in the one MI requires if you do not have a CPL) or some form of CPL from your home State, and a non-resident CPL will suffice if OPEN carrying... ((a) To a person holding a valid license to carry a pistol concealed upon his or her person issued by his or her state of residence except where the pistol is carried in nonconformance with a restriction appearing on the license.
In this case, a VT resident can OPEN carry in MI with a UTAH CFP.
No wonder LEO is confused...
As you have a VERY good grasp on these statutes, care to tackle my Other question? http://forum.opencarry.org/forums/showthread.php?92643-Janet-Kukuk-Act
28.432 Inapplicability of MCL 28.422; amendatory act as “Janet Kukuk act”.
Sec. 12.
(1) Section 2 (Section 2 is 28.422) does not apply to any of the following:
. . .
(f) A United States citizen holding a license to carry a pistol concealed upon his or her person issued by another state.
Even though MCL 28.432 declares MCL 28.422 inapplicable because I am a US citizen and have a CFP from Utah?