M
McX
Guest
to me it's just a steeeeeenkin tax.
So, they posted an artcle written by Jason Stein of the Journal Sentinel in which he used the word permit 19 times.
While Act 35 / SB93 uses the following language:
CONCEALED WEAPONS LICENSE
logables
Yes I will at all times, just as I carry my DL and fishing and hunting licenses at all times. OR
logables...Thank you for the offer, but I have ample proof of military training with the M1 and 1911 pistol during Navy boot camp. This training will also meet the Wisconsin requirement for a CWP. I also have completed HSC as a youth.
I am a legitimate supporter of the 2A, but lover is going a bit far. As far as the so called troll part, I care not what a handful of posters opinion of me is. The rules of this forum dictate my reporting issues. OR
logables....A discount would be nice, I would donate the money saved to people who have paranoid delusions. OR
oak1971 said:The mere presence of that piece of paper will strike fear into the hearts of evildoers, cause them to repent of their sins, and join a monastery.
You have an even better super power: The Black Stripe! :shocker:jpm84092 said:I may have to move back to WI to get a WI permit so I too can have such power.
I'm very glad they added that part. The way it was originally written, any LEO could approach anyone at any time with no RAS & demand to see a permit....carrying a concealed weapon shall display... license and photographic identification card to a law enforcement officer upon the request of the law enforcement officer while the law enforcement officer is acting in an official capacity and with lawful authority.
And the law requires DOJ to start accepting applications 01SEP, too, but they appear to have no problem ignoring the spirit of that law, either.I know what common sense tells me, and I am pretty sure what case law would end up saying, but currently, there is no statutory requirement...
And the law requires DOJ to start accepting applications 01SEP, too, but they appear to have no problem ignoring the spirit of that law, either.
He is too good for YOUR training as he said. Should be proof enough that he is a troll.
Where does it say that? Please provide a citation.
And the law requires DOJ to start accepting applications 01SEP, too, but they appear to have no problem ignoring the spirit of that law, either.
Where does it say that? Please provide a citation
an application is a prerequisite to a license and there is no date stated by which applications must be made available. We know that one of the following must be true-
(a) DoJ may choose to never make applications (and therefore licenses) available or
(b) DoJ must make applications available by a date determined by some method
Which do you think is correct? If you choose (b), how would you determine the date?
Try this:an application is a prerequisite to a license and there is no date stated by which applications must be made available. We know that one of the following must be true-
(a) DoJ may choose to never make applications (and therefore licenses) available or
(b) DoJ must make applications available by a date determined by some method
Which do you think is correct? If you choose (b), how would you determine the date?
WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL AMENDMENT MEMO
2011 Senate Bill 93
Senate Substitute
Amendment 2, as Amended
Memo published: June 15, 2011 Contact: Anne Sappenfield, Senior Staff Attorney (267-9485)
- Page 7 -
Within 21 days of receiving the application, DOJ must either issue a license or deny the license
application. In addition, beginning on the day after publication of the legislation and ending on the first
day of the fifth month after that day, DOJ must, as soon as practicable and without delay, but no longer
than 45 days after receiving a complete application, either issue the license and promptly send the
licensee the license document by 1st class mail or deny the application, as described above.
And the law requires DOJ to start accepting applications 01SEP, too, but they appear to have no problem ignoring the spirit of that law, either.
Where does it say that? Please provide a citation