Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: ..., and The City of Walker, sigh...

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2009
    Location
    , ,
    Posts
    1,605

    ..., and The City of Walker, sigh...

    The City of Walker is Violating Michigan Codified Law 123.1102 by Continuing to Enforce Walker City Ordinance 50-62.

    This Unlawful Ordinance is Viewable here: http://library1.municode.com/default...ction=whatsnew
    Last edited by aadvark; 07-20-2011 at 03:38 PM.

  2. #2
    Campaign Veteran smellslikemichigan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Troy, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    2,321
    which part?
    "If it ain't loaded and cocked it don't shoot." - Rooster Cogburn
    http://www.graystatemovie.com/

  3. #3
    Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter Venator's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Lansing area, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    6,445
    Quote Originally Posted by aadvark View Post
    The City of Walker is Violating Michigan Codified Law 123.1102 by Continuing to Enforce Walker City Ordinance 50-62.

    This Unlawful Ordinance is Viewable here: http://library1.municode.com/default...ction=whatsnew
    Please cite examples of them enforcing it. Just because it's on the books doesn't mean they enforce it.
    An Amazon best seller "MY PARENTS OPEN CARRY" http://www.myparentsopencarry.com/

    *The information contained above is not meant to be legal advice, but is solely intended as a starting point for further research. These are my opinions, if you have further questions it is advisable to seek out an attorney that is well versed in firearm law.

  4. #4
    Regular Member Bikenut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2009
    Location
    Saginaw, Michigan, USA
    Posts
    2,754
    Quote Originally Posted by Venator View Post
    Please cite examples of them enforcing it. Just because it's on the books doesn't mean they enforce it.
    Well... I am of the opinion (yeah.. I know what that is worth) that because the ordinance is on the books where folks can read it... when it is read by someone the ordinance was "passively" enforced because........ If a law is on the books just being on the books gives it authority in the mind of the beholder.

    Whether a speed limit sign is a passive enforcement of the speed limit and an officer writing a ticket is active enforcement.... the speed limit was still being enforced. Same thing with an ordinance that is on the books.

    Would the concept of ... passive enforcement... hold up in court? I suspect so since many a law abiding person abides by the law just because there is a law on the books..... for things to be otherwise would enable folks to ignore written law until actively arrested.
    Gun control isn't about the gun at all.... for those who want gun control it is all about their own fragile egos, their own lack of self esteem, their own inner fears, and most importantly... their own desire to dominate others. And an openly carried gun is a slap in the face to all of those things.

  5. #5
    Banned
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Davisburg, Michigan, United States
    Posts
    8,948
    That should go to court, that way some whizbang lawyer can finally put the kabash on those silly 70 mph speed limits on our "free"ways.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •