• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

..., and The City of Walker, sigh...

Venator

Anti-Saldana Freedom Fighter
Joined
Jan 10, 2007
Messages
6,462
Location
Lansing area, Michigan, USA
B

Bikenut

Guest
Please cite examples of them enforcing it. Just because it's on the books doesn't mean they enforce it.
Well... I am of the opinion (yeah.. I know what that is worth) that because the ordinance is on the books where folks can read it... when it is read by someone the ordinance was "passively" enforced because........ If a law is on the books just being on the books gives it authority in the mind of the beholder.

Whether a speed limit sign is a passive enforcement of the speed limit and an officer writing a ticket is active enforcement.... the speed limit was still being enforced. Same thing with an ordinance that is on the books.

Would the concept of ... passive enforcement... hold up in court? I suspect so since many a law abiding person abides by the law just because there is a law on the books..... for things to be otherwise would enable folks to ignore written law until actively arrested.
 
Top