Rich B
Regular Member
This was mentioned on another thread.
I can see good and bad for this, and Jonathan expressed some concern, so I figure we should put our heads together before doing anything.
The pros I can see:
- We have a different AG.
- The state has a different climate towards OC. LEOs are slowly starting to get it.
- We have multiple cases of officers doing the wrong thing and the mess it will cause them as incentive for the state to stop the madness.
- The law is on our side. Ruling anything different than what we have would be damaging to the AG's reputation.
I believe the worst that can happen is he will ignore us or keep deferring us to other people like Ed Peruta experienced previously.
Thoughts?
I can see good and bad for this, and Jonathan expressed some concern, so I figure we should put our heads together before doing anything.
The pros I can see:
- We have a different AG.
- The state has a different climate towards OC. LEOs are slowly starting to get it.
- We have multiple cases of officers doing the wrong thing and the mess it will cause them as incentive for the state to stop the madness.
- The law is on our side. Ruling anything different than what we have would be damaging to the AG's reputation.
I believe the worst that can happen is he will ignore us or keep deferring us to other people like Ed Peruta experienced previously.
Thoughts?