Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Rock Hill Considering "Open Carry" Ban via City attorney Paul Martin

  1. #1
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    42

    Rock Hill Considering "Open Carry" Ban via City attorney Paul Martin

    http://webstergroves.patch.com/articles/rock-hill-consi...

    The Rock Hill Board of Aldermen is considering a measure that would prohibit the open display of firearms in the city.

    The practice is often referred to as "open carry." Carrying an exposed firearm is not outlawed by state statutes, but cities have the option to restrict or ban the practice be enacting local laws.

    City Attorney Paul Martin said the measure, introduced at this week's meeting, would amend the city’s current gun law, which provides an exception for individuals who possess a conceal carry permit.

    Concealed weapons would still be allowed in the city for those possessing a conceal-carry permit as per state law, but the open display of firearms would be prohibited.

  2. #2
    Regular Member sohighlyunlikely's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Overland, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    724

    City Attorney Paul Martin

    Looks like that cockroach City Attorney Paul Martin is spreading his diseased desire to suspend the right of effective self defense to everywhere he can.

    Link fixed
    http://webstergroves.patch.com/artic...open-carry-ban

    Doc
    Last edited by sohighlyunlikely; 08-20-2011 at 03:11 PM.

  3. #3
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    42
    He is a article authored by the city attorney Paul Martin. Essentially he states that the Constitution is a "problem" and calls for the need of warrantless searches. This guy is a openly blatent anticonstitutionalist. The legislation he has authored for many municipalities proves it. He is big into warrantless searches and has written numerous ordinances with many constitutional infirmities. I guess his attitude is, lets write it, see if anyone notices and only remove it when they get sued.

    http://www.mocities.com/resource/res...rantsinmis.pdf

  4. #4
    Regular Member sohighlyunlikely's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Overland, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    724
    Quote Originally Posted by For Pete's Sake! View Post
    He is a article authored by the city attorney Paul Martin. Essentially he states that the Constitution is a "problem" and calls for the need of warrantless searches. This guy is a openly blatant anticonstitutionalist. The legislation he has authored for many municipalities proves it. He is big into warrantless searches and has written numerous ordinances with many constitutional infirmities. I guess his attitude is, lets write it, see if anyone notices and only remove it when they get sued.

    http://www.mocities.com/resource/res...rantsinmis.pdf
    A multi-city city attorney who makes a living looking for a ways to legally get away with violating the US "Bill of Rights". I have never seen such an anti-Constitutionalist before. This man is a cockroach indeed.

    Doc

  5. #5
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    KC
    Posts
    1,012
    I wonder about his line that this wasn't intended by the ordinance. How would he know what was intended? Was he the city attorney when the ordinance was passed?

    Sent from my T-Mobile G2 using Tapatalk

  6. #6
    Regular Member Tony4310's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Florissant, MO
    Posts
    474
    I say we all just leave St.Louis county and let it get over run with crime and call it a day. We are losing the fight here faster and faster. I'm about fed up with St.Louis county now.

  7. #7
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    42
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony4310 View Post
    I say we all just leave St.Louis county and let it get over run with crime and call it a day. We are losing the fight here faster and faster. I'm about fed up with St.Louis county now.
    This is because of the "Progressive" agenda. While the mindless, spineless, liberal sheeple sleep they have managed to infiltrated every aspect of society. The problem now is they have positioned themselves into positions of power and they are many. Their goal is to "fundamentally change America". Sound familiar? They are advancing a coup on America and doing so without firing a shot. Simply put, a Progressive is a Communist/Marxist/Authoritarian/Fascist/Socialist wearing lipstick.

  8. #8
    Regular Member Tony4310's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Florissant, MO
    Posts
    474
    Sorry, I'm just getting irritated at it all. The County crime rate is growing,yet we, the law abiding citizens that carry ( lawfully ) to defend ourselves are treated as the criminals and threats.
    Last edited by Tony4310; 08-20-2011 at 06:35 PM.

  9. #9
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Jefferson City, Mo., ,
    Posts
    490
    Quote Originally Posted by Tony4310 View Post
    Sorry, I'm just getting irritated at it all. The County crime rate is growing,yet we, the law abiding citizens that carry ( lawfully ) to defend ourselves are treated as the criminals and threats.
    That's the problem I see as well. This sucks ....

  10. #10
    Regular Member
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Phoenix, AZ
    Posts
    613
    Quote Originally Posted by sohighlyunlikely View Post
    A multi-city city attorney who makes a living looking for a ways to legally get away with violating the US "Bill of Rights". I have never seen such an anti-Constitutionalist before. This man is a cockroach indeed.

    Doc
    This so-called attorney falls neatly into the category "enemies foreign and DOMESTIC" in the oaths sworn by police and soldiers alike. He is an enemy of the Constitution. Here I must cease commenting...
    __________________________________________________ __________________________

    "The problem with Internet quotes is that no one has verified the source" -- Abraham Lincoln

  11. #11
    Regular Member mspgunner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Ellisville, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    1,966
    Quote Originally Posted by For Pete's Sake! View Post
    This is because of the "Progressive" agenda. While the mindless, spineless, liberal sheeple sleep they have managed to infiltrated every aspect of society. The problem now is they have positioned themselves into positions of power and they are many. Their goal is to "fundamentally change America". Sound familiar? They are advancing a coup on America and doing so without firing a shot. Simply put, a Progressive is a Communist/Marxist/Authoritarian/Fascist/Socialist wearing lipstick.
    Hummm, holding back?
    Don't know if we have a count, how many are going to the City Council meetingSept. 13?

    I'll be there, leaving like now for Steak 'n Shake... A couple of stops first, see 'ya there.
    If you pull it, you use it. If you pull it and you don't use it, you've done some thing wrong and you might not get another chance. Think about it before you pack it!
    I worked 24/7 for 2A OC rights! Don't like what I did? Try it yourself, it was my full time job!
    Certified NRA Range Safety Officer - RSO

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •