Gundude
Regular Member
Here is a quote from Calguns. I think it's pretty accurate.
Forget the world you want. Here is the world you are likely to get:
RKBA is not limited to the home, but some compelling interest exists outside the home in limited circumstances
Sensitive places are those where the gubbermint takes more than token responsibility for your security: if they take your authority to defend yourself, they must accept some responsibility for the outcome. This limits the places they can call 'sensitive' if only because they cannot take responsibility for all government places.
Civilian firearm carry can be restricted from private property, including merchants.
There will be no massive backlash against those who put up "no carry" signs in coastal urban areas.
Eventually some shop owners will tire of policing those who give them money. What starts as a political statement eventually becomes a shoulder-shrug "who cares?" and most eventually tire of the fight. Some will persevere. Major chains get over it and move on.
Anti-gun politicians will still be anti-gun but will move on to other issues because the big fights were won in our favor. Mostly.
The federal legislature will step in and set some new national rules on carry, sales and transport of firearms that supposedly comport with the big decisions. Why? Because Congress abhors a vacuum and right now there is no national carry standard.
People on gun boards will continue to lament about our sorry existence, even while they can carry a loaded firearm into a bank in Beverly Hills.
Forget the world you want. Here is the world you are likely to get:
RKBA is not limited to the home, but some compelling interest exists outside the home in limited circumstances
Sensitive places are those where the gubbermint takes more than token responsibility for your security: if they take your authority to defend yourself, they must accept some responsibility for the outcome. This limits the places they can call 'sensitive' if only because they cannot take responsibility for all government places.
Civilian firearm carry can be restricted from private property, including merchants.
There will be no massive backlash against those who put up "no carry" signs in coastal urban areas.
Eventually some shop owners will tire of policing those who give them money. What starts as a political statement eventually becomes a shoulder-shrug "who cares?" and most eventually tire of the fight. Some will persevere. Major chains get over it and move on.
Anti-gun politicians will still be anti-gun but will move on to other issues because the big fights were won in our favor. Mostly.
The federal legislature will step in and set some new national rules on carry, sales and transport of firearms that supposedly comport with the big decisions. Why? Because Congress abhors a vacuum and right now there is no national carry standard.
People on gun boards will continue to lament about our sorry existence, even while they can carry a loaded firearm into a bank in Beverly Hills.