• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Prosser should have Walsh-Bradley and Abrahamson charged under 943.30

Fast Ed

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2008
Messages
65
Location
Delafield, Wisconsin, USA
Here's the appropriate section of state law.

943.30 Threats to injure or accuse of crime. (1) Whoever,
either verbally or by any written or printed communication,
maliciously threatens to accuse or accuses another of any crime or
offense, or threatens or commits any injury to the person, property,
business, profession, calling or trade, or the profits and income of
any business, profession, calling or trade of another, with intent
thereby to extort money or any pecuniary advantage whatever, or
with intent to compel the person so threatened to do any act against
the person’s will or omit to do any lawful act, is guilty of a Class
H felony.

(4) Whoever violates sub. (1) by attempting to influence the
official action of any public officer is guilty of a Class H felony.

Seems to me that Prosser has a pretty good case.

Fast Ed
 

HandyHamlet

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2010
Messages
2,772
Location
Terra, Sol
Prosser should do the right thing and step down. The whole bench should step down. They are a disgrace.
We are paying for a Chicago based Mediation Firm to come in just so they can get things done. ******* insanity.
 

Shotgun

Wisconsin Carry, Inc.
Joined
Aug 23, 2006
Messages
2,668
Location
Madison, Wisconsin, USA
How about this?

940.203  Battery or threat to judge.
(1) In this section:
(a) "Family member" means a parent, spouse, sibling, child, stepchild, or foster child.
(b) "Judge" means a supreme court justice, court of appeals judge, circuit court judge, municipal judge, temporary or permanent reserve, judge or circuit, supplemental, or municipal court commissioner.
(2) Whoever intentionally causes bodily harm or threatens to cause bodily harm to the person or family member of any judge under all of the following circumstances is guilty of a Class H felony:
(a) At the time of the act or threat, the actor knows or should have known that the victim is a judge or a member of his or her family.
(b) The judge is acting in an official capacity at the time of the act or threat or the act or threat is in response to any action taken in an official capacity.
(c) There is no consent by the person harmed or threatened.
 

DangerClose

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2011
Messages
570
Location
The mean streets of WI
Abrahamson admits "getting close and in his face so he knew she meant business" or whatever similar thing she said, Prosser says, "She charged me," another judge there said she charged him. Prosser only put his hands up because he was being charged at. Abrahamson claims he touched her neck. He's 6' and she's short. Someone short charges you, you put your hands up in surprise... where are your hands going to wind up? Right around the height of their neck. If she was taller, she'd be complaining he touched her breasts.

Prosser should file assault charges against her.
 
Top