Are they really "allowing" anything that the law doesn't make them allow? Outside premises & parking lots..... they can't restrict firearms in those locations after Nov 1st, right? The only place they can post are their buildings, which it sounds like they're going to do. Maybe I just don't understand the law, but it seems as though the article is written to say the UW is being lenient, when according to my interpretation they're restricting as far as they can with in the law.
Are they really "allowing" anything that the law doesn't make them allow? Outside premises & parking lots..... they can't restrict firearms in those locations after Nov 1st, right? The only place they can post are their buildings, which it sounds like they're going to do. Maybe I just don't understand the law, but it seems as though the article is written to say the UW is being lenient, when according to my interpretation they're restricting as far as they can with in the law.
Are they really "allowing" anything that the law doesn't make them allow? Outside premises & parking lots..... they can't restrict firearms in those locations after Nov 1st, right? The only place they can post are their buildings, which it sounds like they're going to do. Maybe I just don't understand the law, but it seems as though the article is written to say the UW is being lenient, when according to my interpretation they're restricting as far as they can with in the law.
Are they really "allowing" anything that the law doesn't make them allow? Outside premises & parking lots..... they can't restrict firearms in those locations after Nov 1st, right? The only place they can post are their buildings, which it sounds like they're going to do. Maybe I just don't understand the law, but it seems as though the article is written to say the UW is being lenient, when according to my interpretation they're restricting as far as they can with in the law.