• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

September 18th WI Permit to Carry course

oak1971

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
1,937
Location
Wisconsin, USA
How does he know what the DOJ will require before they announce it? Psychic hotline? I realize one can make some reasonable assumptions based on what is stated in ACT 35, but until DOJ issues its proclamation complete certitude is not guaranteed. That is why I will not advocate for anyone to take any training that bills itself as meeting the Wisconsin requirements. I have taken a Utah course for my own amusement, but I am under no illusions that it would qualify for Wisconsin permit, nor does it need to in my case because I already posses one of the specific qualifiers as stated in ACT 35. I don't want to discourage folks from taking a class, but people cannot be sure of what the DOJ will come up with before hand. I will go as far as saying that any Person or Company that tells you that their course meets Wisconsin requirements is LYING. The probability that most of the training being pushed will qualify may be high, but if you want to gamble you don't need a trainer you need a casino. The Indians will be happy to take your money, and you might get a free drink or two out of the deal.
 
Last edited:

Interceptor_Knight

Regular Member
Joined
May 18, 2007
Messages
2,851
Location
Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
How does he know what the DOJ will require before they announce it? Psychic hotline? I realize one can make some reasonable assumptions based on what is stated in ACT 35, but until DOJ issues its proclamation complete certitude is not guaranteed. That is why I will not advocate for anyone to take any training that bills itself as meeting the Wisconsin requirements. I have taken a Utah course for my own amusement, but I am under no illusions that it would qualify for Wisconsin permit, nor does it need to in my case because I already posses one of the specific qualifiers as stated in ACT 35. I don't want to discourage folks from taking a class, but people cannot be sure of what the DOJ will come up with before hand. I will go as far as saying that any Person or Company that tells you that their course meets Wisconsin requirements is LYING. The probability that most of the training being pushed will qualify may be high, but if you want to gamble you don't need a trainer you need a casino. The Indians will be happy to take your money, and you might get a free dink or two out of the deal.

It is Statutory that AACFI training will be accepted and it is Statutory that Utah CCW training will be accepted. The only Administrative Code which we are waiting on is what needs to be printed on the Certificate of Training. I can tell you that Henry will personally ensure that you would receive an acceptable certificate once the requirements are published if the initial certificate is in any way lacking.
 
Last edited:

BROKENSPROKET

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
2,199
Location
Trempealeau County
It is Statutory that AACFI training will be accepted and it is Statutory that Utah CCW training will be accepted. The only Administrative Code which we are waiting on is what needs to be printed on the Certificate of Training. I can tell you that Henry will personally ensure that you would receive an acceptable certificate once the requirements are published if the initial certificate is in any way lacking.

+1000
That is exzctly the point I have been making. They may also mandate that trainers keep adequate records also.
 

GLOCK21GB

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
4,347
Location
Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
It is Statutory that AACFI training will be accepted and it is Statutory that Utah CCW training will be accepted. The only Administrative Code which we are waiting on is what needs to be printed on the Certificate of Training. I can tell you that Henry will personally ensure that you would receive an acceptable certificate once the requirements are published if the initial certificate is in any way lacking.

+1
 

mrjam2jab

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2009
Messages
769
Location
Levittown, Pennsylvania, USA
It is Statutory that AACFI training will be accepted and it is Statutory that Utah CCW training will be accepted. The only Administrative Code which we are waiting on is what needs to be printed on the Certificate of Training. I can tell you that Henry will personally ensure that you would receive an acceptable certificate once the requirements are published if the initial certificate is in any way lacking.


Other than "Certificate of Completion" "Name of Class" "Name of Participant" "Signature of Instructor"...your basic cert info...I don't see where they can "require" anything else be printed...
 

oak1971

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
1,937
Location
Wisconsin, USA
I can read just fine thank you. When I read something official on the DOJ site I will consider the matter closed. Its not a hard concept to understand. Why everyone is so anxious to run out and do something even if its wrong is mystifying.
 

GLOCK21GB

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 22, 2009
Messages
4,347
Location
Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
Once you learn to read, you will be forever free

Ya gotta laugh at these people who think they are so right & while everyone else in the know is so very wrong... Soon very soon they will be eating their own words, while looking really dumb at the same time..I am going to enjoy throwing these posts back at em when the application fine tuning is all done.
 

Wisconsin Carry Inc. - Chairman

Wisconsin Carry, Inc.
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
1,197
Location
, ,
I would hope that it goes without saying, but despite the title. Wisconsin Carry is in no way associated with this training course. Our name and logo are federally trademarked. Anyone who uses the "WI Carry" "WCI" "Wisconsin Carry, Inc." name without our permission is exposing themselves to civil liability.

With that said, Wisconsin Carry will NEVER charge a fee for any training we offer. NEVER. We hope to offer a FREE training course.If we cannot offer a training course for FREE we will not offer one. Unfortunately, the "powers that be" that lobbied for the SHALL ISSUE law which requires you to get permission from the government to exercise your right to carry put some difficult obstacles in place. The people who lobbied for the SHALL ISSUE law (while WCI was lobbying for CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY) got it written into law that NATIONAL organizations who certify firearms instructors "qualify". Wisconsin Carry is PROUDLY not a NATIONAL organization but an ALL VOLUNTEER IN-STATE organization.

We will continue to explore getting certification/approval to offer a training course FREE OF CHARGE but please understand that the money-train that lined up to infringe on YOUR right to carry has done ALL they could do to prevent a grass-roots in-state organization like Wisconsin Carry from being able to offer the free training we want to offer.

Follow the money. Those who stand to profit from training did all they could to make sure the free training that WCI wants to offer would be difficult for us to get certification/approval for.

To add one more thing. I no longer follow the OCDO forum. I was alerted to this thread from a member who also indicated that there is a facebook page called "constitutional carry for wisconsin" who is "calling out" Wisconsin Carry" for charging for training.

Clearly whomever the person behind the "constitutional carry for Wisconsin" facebook page is, they not only jumped to conclusions assuming this thread which inappropriately indicates "WI Carry" is offering this training has anything to do with Wisconsin Carry, but they ALSO were so lazy and presumptive that they didn't take the time to email me or any WCI board member/officer to inquire about our involvement (or lack there-of) in this training.

Its clear that anyone with a keyboard and fingers can make unfounded claims on facebook pages that they threw together on a whim.

We incorporated a non-profit all volunteer corporation so-as to establish a professional organization that operated in an honest and professional manor. Where people get their information from is up to them, but it should go without saying "verify your source" before you do....

Edited to add:

almost forgot. While some keyboard commando's are making unsubstantiated libelous claims against WCI on facebook, I have been invited by the 2nd Amendment Foundation to speak and be a panelist at their "Open Carry/Concealed Carry/Constitutional Carry" session during their National "Gun Rights Policy National Conference" later this month. If anyone is interested in attending please let me know. The most notable 2nd amendment attorneys in the country including Alan Gura will be in attendance. Its a chance to get beyond the pithy non-sense of online forum soap-opera's and network with some hard-core IN-THE-KNOW right-to-carry advocates . hope to see those of you that prefer action over drama there!
 
Last edited:

oak1971

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
1,937
Location
Wisconsin, USA
Ya gotta laugh at these people who think they are so right & while everyone else in the know is so very wrong... Soon very soon they will be eating their own words, while looking really dumb at the same time..I am going to enjoy throwing these posts back at em when the application fine tuning is all done.

That's the point Einstein...It isn't done. When it is done, that will be the time to look for training. Should I draw pictures?
 

BROKENSPROKET

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
2,199
Location
Trempealeau County
That's the point Einstein...It isn't done. When it is done, that will be the time to look for training. Should I draw pictures?

I already have more than enough training that I KNOW will qualify. Know one has to wait to take trainiing that WE KNOW will qualify. IF you point is to not trust every training program, I concede, but it's not diffucult to find out what does qualifiy without DOJ saying a single word.
 

oak1971

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
1,937
Location
Wisconsin, USA
I already have more than enough training that I KNOW will qualify. Know one has to wait to take trainiing that WE KNOW will qualify. IF you point is to not trust every training program, I concede, but it's not diffucult to find out what does qualifiy without DOJ saying a single word.

As do I, the larger point is the general public who may not be as informed on such matters. For them, the best bet is to keep their powder dry until the dust settles. :banghead:
 

BROKENSPROKET

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
2,199
Location
Trempealeau County
I would hope that it goes without saying, but despite the title. Wisconsin Carry is in no way associated with this training course. Our name and logo are federally trademarked. Anyone who uses the "WI Carry" "WCI" "Wisconsin Carry, Inc." name without our permission is exposing themselves to civil liability.

QUOTE]

There is a company advertising thier phone number as 1-xxx-WICARRY. I put x's in the numbers I don't remember. That would be 942-2779, but like said, I don't remember the area code.
 

Wisconsin Carry Inc. - Chairman

Wisconsin Carry, Inc.
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
1,197
Location
, ,
I would hope that it goes without saying, but despite the title. Wisconsin Carry is in no way associated with this training course. Our name and logo are federally trademarked. Anyone who uses the "WI Carry" "WCI" "Wisconsin Carry, Inc." name without our permission is exposing themselves to civil liability.

QUOTE]

There is a company advertising thier phone number as 1-xxx-WICARRY. I put x's in the numbers I don't remember. That would be 942-2779, but like said, I don't remember the area code.

Thanks for the head's up. I'll look into it/alert our attorneys.

2 weeks ago we had a situation with someone using a logo very close to our trademarked logo. In that case, i think it was unintentional so I emailed the organization and it was quickly resolved amicably without attorneys.

All that aside. I hope people take it to the bank. You have my word. Wisconsin Carry will NEVER EVER charge for training to meet the states unjust infringement on the right to carry via the training mandate... As soon as we have the ability to offer it we will. We are working on it, but unfortunately there ARE nationally "certified" organizations who stacked the deck against us.
 

oak1971

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2008
Messages
1,937
Location
Wisconsin, USA
Thanks for the head's up. I'll look into it/alert our attorneys.

2 weeks ago we had a situation with someone using a logo very close to our trademarked logo. In that case, i think it was unintentional so I emailed the organization and it was quickly resolved amicably without attorneys.

All that aside. I hope people take it to the bank. You have my word. Wisconsin Carry will NEVER EVER charge for training to meet the states unjust infringement on the right to carry via the training mandate... As soon as we have the ability to offer it we will. We are working on it, but unfortunately there ARE nationally "certified" organizations who stacked the deck against us.

Based on what I have seen thus far, getting a cert as a "trainer" shouldn't be a huge deal. Time and money, but not insurmountable. I would do it for free on a local basis if I had the certification.
 

comp45acp

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2006
Messages
383
Location
Watertown, WI, ,
It should be noted that AACFI was leading the charge for very high training requirements. Their head guys traveled down from MN and sat in the front row at the hearing in the Capitol and testified that in
depth training was needed. It should also be noted that they recently required all of their instructors in WI to sign non-compete letters in that they would teach ONLY AACFI courses. Many have refused seeing it for what it is, a money grabbing scheme and have left the organization. AACFT is now in the process of trying to recruit new instructors to take their place.
 
Top