hermannr
Regular Member
May I add a couple of words to your complaint.
"A pistol in it's holster has never harmed anyone, it is only dangerous when removed from it's retention. Whay would the officers want to endanger anyone by removing a completely legal carry?" (not counting the fact that removing the weapon was unnecessary and illegal.)
Item two: I'm not so much for asserting the 4th ammendment as I am the Washington State constitution Article 1 section 7. We are in Washington, and our state constitution's wording is stronger than the US constitution's
"A pistol in it's holster has never harmed anyone, it is only dangerous when removed from it's retention. Whay would the officers want to endanger anyone by removing a completely legal carry?" (not counting the fact that removing the weapon was unnecessary and illegal.)
Item two: I'm not so much for asserting the 4th ammendment as I am the Washington State constitution Article 1 section 7. We are in Washington, and our state constitution's wording is stronger than the US constitution's