• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

State Bar of Wisconsin | Castle doctrine: Lawmakers considering law on self-defense

H

Herr Heckler Koch

Guest
http://www.wisbar.org/AM/Template.c...sideTrack/contentDisplay.cfm&ContentID=105689
Joe Forward said:
But opponents, like the State Bar of Wisconsin’s Criminal Law Section, warn the proposed castle doctrine legislation could create unintended consequences, given the nuanced workings of presumptions and evidence law that are specific to Wisconsin.

“It could actually give a presumption in favor of a murderer,” said Marquette Law School Professor Gregory O’Meara, who testified before the Wisconsin Assembly’s Judiciary and Ethics Committee on AB 69 in May. The Wisconsin Senate’s companion bill is SB 79.

The Criminal Law Section’s opposition centers in part on the law of mistake, which holds that an actor’s belief may be reasonable even if that belief was mistaken. Section 939.43. Thus, a person who kills another person under the mistaken belief that deadly force was necessary to thwart an imminent deadly attack could still be found to have acted reasonably.

But O’Meara points out that under Wisconsin law, the presumption does not disappear, even in the face of evidence to the contrary. Thus, the law of mistake would benefit someone who lies.
 
Top