Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Supreme Court won't review gun rights outside of home - CNBC

  1. #1
    State Pioneer ConditionThree's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Shasta County, California, USA
    Posts
    2,231

    Supreme Court won't review gun rights outside of home - CNBC

    http://www.cnbc.com/id/44758058

    The justices let stand a ruling by Maryland's highest court that upheld a state law prohibiting the carrying of a handgun without a permit outside of one's home.

    The court turned down the opportunity to define the reach of its landmark 2008 ruling that the constitutional right to keep and bear arms applies to individuals and allows them to use guns for lawful purposes such as self-defense in the home.
    New to OPEN CARRY in California? Click and read this first...

    NA MALE SUBJ ON FOOT, LS NB 3 AGO HAD A HOLSTERED HANDGUN ON HIS RIGHT HIP. WAS NOT BRANDISHING THE WEAPON, BUT RP FOUND SUSPICIOUS.
    CL SUBJ IN COMPLIANCE WITH LAW


    Support the 2A in California - Shop Amazon for any item and up to 15% of all purchases go back to the Calguns Foundation. Enter through either of the following links
    www.calgunsfoundation.org/amazon
    www.shop42a.com

  2. #2
    Regular Member okboomer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Oklahoma, USA
    Posts
    1,164
    I don't see where this has any bearing on Gun Rights outside of the home in MD.

    Williams bought his handgun legally from a licensed dealer in August 2007, but never applied for a permit.
    AND...

    When asked what he had hidden in the bushes, Williams replied, "My gun." The officer then retrieved the handgun, a black Glock with 15 rounds in the magazine.
    As I understand the appeal, it did not ask the court to comment on the constitutionality of the MD permit requirement, rather it asked for the court to "dismiss" the state permit requirement in light of Williams' failure to acquire the permit.

    Then, I am confused by the implications of the second statement ... the man had a gun in a book bag that he had HIDDEN(?) in the bushes??? So, at some point in time, the gun was left unattended in public? IMHO, Williams demonstrated in no uncertain terms that he was unfit to carry or posses a firearm.
    cheers - okboomer
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
    Lead, follow, or get out of the way

    Exercising my 2A Rights does NOT make me a CRIMINAL! Infringing on the exercise of those rights makes YOU one!

  3. #3
    Campaign Veteran since9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
    Posts
    6,787

    The Supreme Court of the United States of America is Dead - R.I.P.

    Key point in the article: "The Supreme Court ruled in 2010 that gun rights applied not just to federal laws, but to state and city laws as well. The court's rulings in the gun cases have been closely divided, by 5-4 votes and split along conservative and liberal lines."

    If they've ruled that gun rights apply at the local, state, and federal levels, then they've ruled. Since they did not rule that gun rights apply only in the home or only outside the home, then their ruling is all-inclusive, applying both inside as well as outside the home.

    That's why I say the Supreme Court is dead. They must be, as this was a no-brainer. All they would have had to do is uphold their previous 2010 ruling with a minor clarification. They did not, and since anyone alive would have done so, they must be dead.

    Perhaps they're zombies, merely brain-dead, for ruling that gun rights apply to individuals. As the Constitutional commandment "shall not be infringed" immediately follows, they have already set the standard: "[An individual's] right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed."

    Yet having set the standard, they ignore a Maryland court's decision that infringes on the right of individuals to keep and bear arms?

    They must be dead. Otherwise, this would have been classified as a reversal, rather than letting a lower court's decision stand.
    The First protects the Second, and the Second protects the First. Together, they protect the rest of our Bill of Rights and our United States Constitution, and help We the People protect ourselves in the spirit of our Declaration of Independence.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •