paul@paul-fisher.com
Regular Member
Paul –
Thanks for the info. Rep August opposes this bill.
-Luke
Luke Bacher
Legislative Assistant
State Representative Tyler August
Let's get more like this.
Paul –
Thanks for the info. Rep August opposes this bill.
-Luke
Luke Bacher
Legislative Assistant
State Representative Tyler August
I wrote my rep hebl on Monday, but knowing his MO, he won't respond back until this bill is decided one way or another, and it'll be a generic "this is how the bill did" letter with NO indication of what he did about it, in PDF format
This law would change absolutely nothing in the Brookfield case.Motofixxer said:This bill would effectively put an end to any kind of civil rights suits.
AB 237 -- I just got off the phone with the bill author Rep. Joel Kleefish. We spent 20 minutes discussing this issue in depth. I would first like to let everyone know that Representative Kleefish really got a snow-job from the Asst. Brookfield Police Chief which he relied on to craft this bill. He assured me that if what I shared was factual (that police would still be able to issue citations for civil forfeiture WITHOUT the power to arrest) that he would pull the bill out of process. As mentioned previously, this is not a case of a legislator going after our rights, it was a case of a legislator being egregiously mislead by someone they took as an "expert". I genuinely believe Rep Kleefish was rolled on this one and is going to pull the bill as soon as he verifies what I shared with him with legal counsel.
Dear Chris,
Thank you for your email in regards to your opposition to Assembly Bill
(AB) 237, being offered by Representative Joel Kleefisch (R-Oconomowoc)
and Senator Van Wanggaard (R-Racine). I can understand your concern
with this proposal and I am pleased you have brought your thoughts to my
attention.
Upon review of this proposal, I too have great concerns about the intent
of this legislation. The conduct by which our law enforcement officials
are held to has been proven to be effective over many decades. Our
system which allows law enforcement to issue citations for any state
civil forfeiture is and will continue to be an adequate manner to
enforce the law. If a citation is not paid then it is up to a judge to
issue a warrant for the delinquent's arrest. I believe that such a
system has served our state well, and any change will only cause
confusion and uncertainty amongst our constituency.
I am baffled by the unanimous 9-0 vote on this legislation which allowed
it be passed by the Assembly Committee on Criminal Justice &
Corrections. I believe that the misrepresentation of facts has led to
some in the legislature to blindly follow this proposal which would be
detrimental to our justice system and could potentially harm the
integrity of our law enforcement officials. It is important that we as
elected officials get all the facts and take all views into
consideration before making a decision on such an important piece of
legislation. I will be sharing the many emails I have received from my
constituents with my colleagues to inform them of how this far reaching
and unnecessary proposal could potentially affect our state.
I have been informed by the Assembly Speaker's office that this bill
will not be getting the Assembly's full consideration, which means that
the bill will not be brought for a vote during this current legislative
session. However, if by chance this bill does come before the Assembly
for a vote, I will be voting no on this legislation.
I hope this response is encouraging to you. Again, I thank you for
bringing your thoughts to my attention. If you should have any further
questions or concerns regarding this or any other state government
issues, please do not hesitate to contact me or my office. It is a
pleasure serving you in the State Assembly.
Regards,
John Murtha
State Representative
29th Assembly District
Ding dong, the witch is dead!
Ding dong, the witch is dead!