legal alien gun ownership protected by 2A & Equal Protection Clause - in WA - for now
http://volokh.com/2011/10/27/second...on-clause-victory-for-legal-alien-gun-owners/
This is going to be BIG news if it survives any further challenges - and yes, I fully expect Washington State to go as far as SCOTUS to fight this.
Armchair lawyers as well as attorneys are encouraged to read the decision and absorb the reasoning.
stay safe.
http://volokh.com/2011/10/27/second...on-clause-victory-for-legal-alien-gun-owners/
A pre-2009 Washington state law, under which Yasin Ibrahim was convicted, required aliens to get a license . (A new statute sets up a different licensing scheme for alien gun owners, but that statute wasn’t involved in this case.) Ibrahim was prosecuted under the old law, for having an unlicensed gun. Today’s State v. Ibrahim (Wash. Ct. App.) holds that the old law violated the Equal Protection Clause by unconstitutionally discriminating against noncitizens. And in the process the court says that the law did this “by denying [legal aliens’] Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.”
This independent focus on the Second Amendment is important because the Supreme Court has read the Equal Protection Clause as barring most (but not all) state discrimination against noncitizens; the federal government remains generally free to discriminate against noncitizens. But if the Washington Court of Appeals is right that legal aliens are protected by the Second Amendment, that means that even the federal government may not ban them from owning guns.
This is going to be BIG news if it survives any further challenges - and yes, I fully expect Washington State to go as far as SCOTUS to fight this.
Armchair lawyers as well as attorneys are encouraged to read the decision and absorb the reasoning.
stay safe.