• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Getting legislation for EMS to carry firearms

Mayhem

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
115
Location
Everywhere
Agree to disagree

A lot of states do have regulations that require owners to lock firearms if children are around, and hold them criminally liable if a child is injured by an improperly stored firearm.

I am not looking at making them military combat medics even though a lot of police agencies are arming EMT's & Medics as Tactical Medics across the county. I am looking at allowing "us" to carry a firearm for the times when we don't know that a scene will turn unsafe for us with no PD around.

No I do not have statistics I know there have been a couple times that I have had very close calls personally over sixteen years. The only thing I do know is and I will repeat it again 40% of EMS injuries are assault related.

My final statement before you pass judgement on if you think we should be armed. Are you an EMT? Paramedic? Firefighter? Police Officer? any type of First Responder involved in street level public safety? If not I really do not understand how you can think or possibly know what we need and do not need? There is a lot of stuff that never makes it to the media more so now with HIPPA.

Virginia does not require people to lock up their guns. Only keep them out of the reach of children. And I would like it that way so I could have quick access to a loaded gun since I have no kids in my house.

No, I do not work in public safety. But I feel that medics are not expected to enter a dangerous situation and can wait for the police. I have heard of the medics "staging" and waiting for police to show before they go in where it might be dangerous.

I do not see the need to arm medics with firearms. I do not know of any community that is so bad that medics need to sneak up to the victim's door, guns drawn at the low ready, and give medical assistance. LOL

My greatest fear is that our cops do not appear to get enough training, and now we would have medics with far less training deploying firearms!! Don't get me wrong, I understand what you are getting at. But we have to draw the line on duties. I would not want a cop cross trained to give me an IV for heat stroke since he does not do it every day. Same goes for a medic deploying a firearm and shooting at what he believes is a threat.

If the community is that bad on a daily basis... it sounds like the medic unit needs to add a police swat team member!!

So we can agree to disagree on this.
 
Last edited:

Wolf_shadow

Activist Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2006
Messages
1,215
Location
Accomac, Virginia, USA
Virginia does not require people to lock up their guns. Only keep them out of the reach of children. And I would like it that way so I could have quick access to a loaded gun since I have no kids in my house.

No, I do not work in public safety. But I feel that medics are not expected to enter a dangerous situation and can wait for the police. I have heard of the medics "staging" and waiting for police to show before they go in where it might be dangerous.

I do not see the need to arm medics with firearms. I do not know of any community that is so bad that medics need to sneak up to the victim's door, guns drawn at the low ready, and give medical assistance. LOL

My greatest fear is that our cops do not appear to get enough training, and now we would have medics with far less training deploying firearms!! Don't get me wrong, I understand what you are getting at. But we have to draw the line on duties. I would not want a cop cross trained to give me an IV for heat stroke since he does not do it every day. Same goes for a medic deploying a firearm and shooting at what he believes is a threat.

If the community is that bad on a daily basis... it sounds like the medic unit needs to add a police swat team member!!

So we can agree to disagree on this.
Do you carry a firearm for your personal safety? If so why?
A large number of times ambulance crews are dispatched to areas that are normally safe, for what seams to be a routine call.
A while back a medic unit here was dispatched for a general illness call, on arrival the patient suddenly attacked one of the medics beating him severly and putting him out of work for some time. If the attacker had picked up a weapon the medic would have been killed.
I just want to be allowed to do at work what I can do when I'm off. It would be no different than I have to do as far as knowing when I can and can't use my firearm when I'm off and on my own.
:banghead:
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
Virginia does not require people to lock up their guns. Only keep them out of the reach of children. And I would like it that way so I could have quick access to a loaded gun since I have no kids in my house.

Better to teach the children gun safety. Would you not want "quick access" if there were children in the house?

No, I do not work in public safety. But I feel that medics are not expected to enter a dangerous situation and can wait for the police. I have heard of the medics "staging" and waiting for police to show before they go in where it might be dangerous.

What one "feels" is not relevant - the point is that situations can change in a heart beat.

I do not see the need to arm medics with firearms. I do not know of any community that is so bad that medics need to sneak up to the victim's door, guns drawn at the low ready, and give medical assistance. LOL

Over exaggeration is the tool of an anti. BTW - where is this mythical community that is so safe that people do NOT need the ability to defend themselves.

My greatest fear is that our cops do not appear to get enough training, and now we would have medics with far less training deploying firearms!! Don't get me wrong, I understand what you are getting at. But we have to draw the line on duties. I would not want a cop cross trained to give me an IV for heat stroke since he does not do it every day. Same goes for a medic deploying a firearm and shooting at what he believes is a threat.

Ah so - the truth comes out. Apparently you believe that only those with a certain mandated level of training have the right to self-defense and that they should only be trained in one discipline. Will you refuse first aid from a LEO?

If the community is that bad on a daily basis... it sounds like the medic unit needs to add a police swat team member!!

Again the mythical safe community. Doesn't have to happen on a daily basis - just once is too often, a 10 sec interval.

So we can agree to disagree on this.

My responses bolded in blue.

Yep and I do disagree........ with the lack of logic.
 

Mayhem

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
115
Location
Everywhere
Do you carry a firearm for your personal safety? If so why?
A large number of times ambulance crews are dispatched to areas that are normally safe, for what seams to be a routine call.
A while back a medic unit here was dispatched for a general illness call, on arrival the patient suddenly attacked one of the medics beating him severely and putting him out of work for some time. If the attacker had picked up a weapon the medic would have been killed.
I just want to be allowed to do at work what I can do when I'm off. It would be no different than I have to do as far as knowing when I can and can't use my firearm when I'm off and on my own.
:banghead:

I carry for self-protection because I do not have a police/fire/ems radio that can call a ton of cops who will run code 3 to get to me. I open carry in the summer months, CC in the winter months, and I do not get to carry at my job either.

My problem with this whole EMS can carry is ANOTHER special class of citizens. It is bad enough that cops get to carry all over the place where the rest of us cannot. But now some want to grant EMS this same ability too. All under the facade that crap "could" happen while they are working.

I have still not seen any statistic to show how often medics are killed or even injured to such a degree where a firearm could have prevented it. Maybe you should look into the use of a taser instead?

If you want to tip the scales... show me some numbers to justify firearms and I will buy in 100%. But as it stands... medics do not appear to be in any more danger than any other job. As I said.. Taxi drivers should get first consideration for going to work armed.

Medics have the option to wait for cops to clear up the scene before they go in to save lives. If a medic goes into a dangerous scene... it is no different than one of us who open carry walking into a fist fight happening. It is our own fault if we get punched in the face. But I will guess you will say something about medics have to go into danger. If so, please show me where they have been successfully sued for not doing so.

The problem is that you want the ability to carry on the job and can make up anything you want to justify it. I need some hard proof to agree you need it over the rest of us citizens who cannot. Don't get me wrong... I wish we could all carry on the job. But what makes EMS better than the rest of us workers?



"Much of what is known about taxi robbery is based on information recorded on assaults and homicides by occupation.† These data consistently show that, as an occupation or industry, taxi drivers have the highest or among the highest risk of job-related homicide and assault.1 Robbery is the motive for more than half of all work-related homicides (80 percent) and non-fatal assaults (60 percent).2 A U.S. study that did look at robbery victimization data by occupation also found that taxi drivers were among those most often robbed.

Factors Contributing to Robbery of Taxi Drivers

Taxi drivers are at risk of robbery due to a combination of factors related to the nature of their job:
•They have contact with a large number of strangers or people they do not know well.
•They often work in high-crime areas.
•They usually carry cash with them in an unsecured manner and handle money as payment.
•They usually work alone.
•They often go to, or through, isolated locations.
•They often work late at night or early in the morning.

These risk factors, among others, have been mentioned in a number of studies of workplace homicide and violence in general"

Source
 

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
....snip....

My problem with this whole EMS can carry is ANOTHER special class of citizens. It is bad enough that cops get to carry all over the place where the rest of us cannot. But now some want to grant EMS this same ability too. All under the facade that crap "could" happen while they are working.

I have still not seen any statistic to show how often medics are killed or even injured to such a degree where a firearm could have prevented it.

It would seem you want such restrictions/limitations on EMS personnel because there are some restrictions on others. Strange premise. Yep, we do carry for what might happen - explain please the fallacy of that.

Since when are numbers, statistics relevant to the question? Would it be more justified if the figures demonstrated an immediate need? Why is not the personal right to self-defense enough? Surely it cannot be that this in not your right that is being questioned.

At any given time, the odds are against needing such ability. It is for the benefit of the unusual and extreme need that any of us carry,
 

Jay

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2009
Messages
307
Location
Charlottesville, VA
I carry for self-protection because I do not have a police/fire/ems radio that can call a ton of cops who will run code 3 to get to me.

And what am I suppose to do when I am looking down the barrel of a patients gun after I call on the radio. Throw the radio at them?!?! In my county on an overnight shift three county officers cover 720 square miles.

By your own omission you have never worked in our line of work please stop spewing statements like word vomit you have NO!!! idea what we go through, and you have no idea how the system works except for what you might see on Reality TV Shows!!!!

I think at this point it is very obvious that your thoughts and logic on this topic are in the minority compared to what others feel and have stated in this post. All I have seen is you keep asking the same questions over and over. Myself and others have answered the questions over and over.
 
Last edited:

Sesrun

Regular Member
Joined
May 4, 2011
Messages
84
Location
Roanoke, VA
...snip...

If you want to tip the scales... show me some numbers to justify firearms and I will buy in 100%. But as it stands... medics do not appear to be in any more danger than any other job.

...snip...


Below are some statistics I found to help your need of statistical proof...


Our data showed homicide to be the third leading cause of occupational fatality for EMS workers.
Source

According to a 2005 NAEMT study, the No. 1 injury to EMS providers is assault, with 52% of those surveyed saying they'd been attacked on the job. According to Brian Maguire, DrPH, MSA, a clinical associate professor at the University of Maryland, Baltimore County, who studied the issue, "The risk of nonfatal assault resulting in lost work time among EMS workers is 0.6 cases per 100 workers per year. The national average is about 1.8 cases per 10,000 workers per year. So the relative risk for EMS workers is about 30 times higher than the national average.

The problem is also bad for hospital workers. In 1999, the Bureau of Labor Statistics estimated that 2,637 nonfatal assaults occurred to this population--a rate of 8.3 assaults per 10,000 workers. This rate is significantly higher than the rate for other private-sector industries, which is around 2 per 10,000 workers. Healthcare providers are more likely to be assaulted on the job than police officers or prison guards.
Source


There are many times in which EMS will respond to a call that is not thought to require a police response but which later proves to be dangerous to the EMS personnel on scene already involved in patient care. Even when calling for police in such a situation, if you operate in a large county area, it can be 10-15 minutes with them "running code 3" just to get to the scene. The danger exists for EMS personnel. They may have radio access to police but police are still minutes away while they are needed in seconds if you are immediately faced with a threat. I have personally seen an O2 tank used as a weapon twice, once against a patient family member trying to stab a medic with a kitchen knife, another time against an extremely violent patient who was later found to be bi-polar. A gun may not have been the correct tool for those specific situations but I am sure that other situations would demand such a tool. Regardless such situations are not a fun place to be and you may not realize exactly how bad it can be until you are placed in such a situation.
 
Last edited:

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
Please do not confound the issue with facts, rights and other meaningful thinking.

Some will still have the "feeling" that self-defense is the root cause of the problem and will not open the gateway to their personal cognitive processor. Some will take a negative position just because they can, but should expect a less than stellar reception here.

We are about choices, not limiting the selection.
 

paramedic70002

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
1,440
Location
Franklin, VA, Virginia, USA
I've been an EMS provider, from EMT to Paramedic, volunteer and career, rural suburban and metro, 911 and transport, for 30 years.

Listen to me.

I have never been in a position to shoot someone in EMS, but neither outside of EMS, but I have been darn close in both, and there have been many more times in EMS. Here are a few anecdotes I have from experience and first person witnesses where EMS would have been better off armed, and LEO response was not indicated (one where LEO was there):

Suffolk: One EMT I used to work with went on a sick call. When he knocked on the door, a man opened up and thrust a knife out. They ran and were dang lucky the perp didn't pursue.

Suffolk: An ambulance went on a call down a long lane. As they pulled up, shots came from the house. They did a hasty retreat but backed the ambulance into a ditch and had to run across a field dodging bullets.

Isle of Wight: A transport ambulance dropped off a patient at a trailer park. On their way out, they took rounds from a shotgun and a rifle.

Suffolk: Ambulance and zone car respond to stabbing. Police car is coming down the street behind them. Upon arrival a crowd of over 100 pulls the medics from their vehicles and begin to hit kick and stomp them into a pulp. Eventually a dozen police officers on scene hold back crowd at gunpoint so that the wounded medics can snatch the victim and evacuate.

Suffolk: Ambulance crew working a cardiac arrest in the ambulance are overwhelmed by family members who are distraught and don't understand what is going on and and must abandon the ambulance, and patient, to avoid assault.

Suffolk: Man shot multiple times. Police later learn that the shooter was standing in the crowd watching the proceedings.

Chesapeake: Man unresponsive at party. EMS goes to patient. Crowd surrounds EMS and tells them that if they patient doesn't wake up and walk out, they don't either.

Isle of Wight: 911 response to a fall. Find woman at bottom of stairs. Because the boyfriend, behind me, threw her down there and repeatedly kicked her.

Isle of Wight: Shoulder pain. Because the husband in the room shot her in the shoulder with a shotgun which was also in the room.

Southampton County: Possible DOA. Multiple gunshot wounds, multiple suspects on scene.

Southampton County: Shooting. Ambulance stages in safe zone. Bystanders bring victim to EMS station and stop along way when they see ambulance. Angry at EMS crew for not being on scene.

Suffolk: Assault call, other party not on scene. EMS arrives on scene. Other party returns, fight breaks out.

Surry: Shooting victim brought to Sheriff's Dept. by his brother. EMS arrives on scene. Brother arrested for shooting brother.

Suffolk: Unresponsive. Family member states patient is drunk. EMS asks how much alcohol. Another family member becomes very angry, blocks door, threatens EMS crew.

All over: Private EMS agencies transporting home patients to/from Doctor's appointments and dialysis, and discharged patients from hospital floors and the ED. we go into some pretty sketchy places at all times of the day and night with never an LEO escort. Have been on scene many many times and witnessed street drug transactions. On multiple occasions have been mistaken for police when we walked around a corner even though we had a big yellow stretcher in hand.

OK I remembered those in just a few minutes.

I recall several years ago a news story of a Paramedic that was treating a sick patient when he was assaulted by someone with a knife. He drew and shot the perp while two LEOs stood in the room and watched. He was fired for having a gun (saving his life) but got hired in the next county no questions asked.

Yes these are all anecdotes and not scientifically valid, but how often do you need to hear quack quack before you believe there's a duck nearby?

One other thought. It's nice to have LEOs on scene. But how many times do LEOs get shot? Then what?

I carry for self-protection because I do not have a police/fire/ems radio that can call a ton of cops who will run code 3 to get to me. I open carry in the summer months, CC in the winter months, and I do not get to carry at my job either.

You have made it obvious that you don't have a clue what you're talking about. Instead of contributing to this topic you are making noise, restating falsehoods and ignoring facts.

My problem with this whole EMS can carry is ANOTHER special class of citizens. It is bad enough that cops get to carry all over the place where the rest of us cannot. But now some want to grant EMS this same ability too. All under the facade that crap "could" happen while they are working.

Not COULD, DOES HAPPEN. Yes LEOs get special perks, but for very valid reasons. This is not to say that every citizen shouldn't have the benefit of some or most of those perks, but that's not the system we live in.

I have still not seen any statistic to show how often medics are killed or even injured to such a degree where a firearm could have prevented it. Maybe you should look into the use of a taser instead?

And you never will. Statistics cannot be produced based on hypothetical situations. Even if such a study was possible, the fact that it hasn't been done does not diminish the validity of the proposal.

If you want to tip the scales... show me some numbers to justify firearms and I will buy in 100%. But as it stands... medics do not appear to be in any more danger than any other job. As I said.. Taxi drivers should get first consideration for going to work armed.

Appearances are deceiving, especially if you don't look.

Medics have the option to wait for cops to clear up the scene before they go in to save lives. If a medic goes into a dangerous scene... it is no different than one of us who open carry walking into a fist fight happening. It is our own fault if we get punched in the face. But I will guess you will say something about medics have to go into danger. If so, please show me where they have been successfully sued for not doing so.

Go volunteer with your local EMS agency and get back to us on this on how it works out for you.

The problem is that you want the ability to carry on the job and can make up anything you want to justify it. I need some hard proof to agree you need it over the rest of us citizens who cannot. Don't get me wrong... I wish we could all carry on the job. But what makes EMS better than the rest of us workers?

You are really starting to sound like an anti-gun troll. Maybe it's your beef against LEO perks but seriously!

"Much of what is known about taxi robbery is based on information recorded on assaults and homicides by occupation.† These data consistently show that, as an occupation or industry, taxi drivers have the highest or among the highest risk of job-related homicide and assault.1 Robbery is the motive for more than half of all work-related homicides (80 percent) and non-fatal assaults (60 percent).2 A U.S. study that did look at robbery victimization data by occupation also found that taxi drivers were among those most often robbed.

Factors Contributing to Robbery of Taxi Drivers

Taxi drivers are at risk of robbery due to a combination of factors related to the nature of their job:
•They have contact with a large number of strangers or people they do not know well.
•They often work in high-crime areas.
•They usually carry cash with them in an unsecured manner and handle money as payment.
•They usually work alone.
•They often go to, or through, isolated locations.
•They often work late at night or early in the morning.

These risk factors, among others, have been mentioned in a number of studies of workplace homicide and violence in general"

Source

I don't have a problem with taxi drivers, store clerks, etc. ad nauseum being allowed to carry. Heck pass a law that says ANYBODY can carry on the job. Problem is, it will NOT pass. You've got to start somewhere, and really how many people are going to be against EMS providers protecting themselves when they are out there saving everyone else?
 
Last edited:

peter nap

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
13,551
Location
Valhalla
I've read this long enough without saying something.

There is no more active opposer of P4P than I am but I gave Jay the idea of introducing leislation in another thread.

They had been going back and forth about CHiPpers (EMS CHiPpers) getting the right (privilege) to carry at work. That's something I'd actively oppose and try to kill early on.

I'd rather they create a small protected class than expand the CHP Hierarchy.

DO EMS NEED TO CARRY...I have no idea but if they want to, I'm all in favor of it as long as it doesn't step on my toes.

Give em police powers...Hell no. That's just what we need, Cinder Cops with Band Aids:uhoh:

I'd be supportive if Jay comes up with a bill that doesn't require a CHP and allows them to carry on the job. Small steps in the right direction are better than Giant Steps backwards.
 

Mayhem

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2011
Messages
115
Location
Everywhere
Reverse my opposition

OK, I am new here...

But I can quickly see that if you are not FOR a thread, you are not allowed to post an opinion that may not agree because it is assumed you do not know anything.

Therefore, I reverse my opposition!

I now agree EMS should all be permitted to carry in the ambulance because they might run into danger requiring the use of a firearm.

I wish you the best in getting the new law passed in Richmond.
 

peter nap

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
13,551
Location
Valhalla
OK, I am new here...

But I can quickly see that if you are not FOR a thread, you are not allowed to post an opinion that may not agree because it is assumed you do not know anything.

Therefore, I reverse my opposition!

I now agree EMS should all be permitted to carry in the ambulance because they might run into danger requiring the use of a firearm.

I wish you the best in getting the new law passed in Richmond.

I don't know why you say that. You have some good points, some not so good and some bad...IMO.
The purpose of the thread is to get all opinions. Expect opposition, sometimes pretty active, but you need a thicker skin.
Someone that calls themselves "Mayhem" should be a little sturdier.

Do you REALLY BELIEVE EVERYONE AGREES WITH ME?:banana:
 
Last edited:

Jay

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2009
Messages
307
Location
Charlottesville, VA
I've read this long enough without saying something.

There is no more active opposer of P4P than I am but I gave Jay the idea of introducing leislation in another thread.

They had been going back and forth about CHiPpers (EMS CHiPpers) getting the right (privilege) to carry at work. That's something I'd actively oppose and try to kill early on.

I'd rather they create a small protected class than expand the CHP Hierarchy.

DO EMS NEED TO CARRY...I have no idea but if they want to, I'm all in favor of it as long as it doesn't step on my toes.

Give em police powers...Hell no. That's just what we need, Cinder Cops with Band Aids:uhoh:

I'd be supportive if Jay comes up with a bill that doesn't require a CHP and allows them to carry on the job. Small steps in the right direction are better than Giant Steps backwards.

1. I do "not" want police powers.

2. I want a state statue that says if I take the 40 hour LEO firearm qualification and maintain qualification, and I am certified and affiliated with an Emergency Response Service. I can carry a firearm concealed anywhere in the commonwealth on/off duty, and I can carry that firearm anywhere while volunteering/working within my agencies response area. Such as responding to a call at k-12 school, court house basically anywhere a LEO can, but only if I am working in a official capacity.

3. If I want a CHP for reciprocity purposes or if HR 822 passes then I would need to get one like everyone else does. Hopefully I could have all the background crap waived if I have the 40 LEO class and you need to pass background for that anyhow.
 
Last edited:

Grapeshot

Legendary Warrior
Joined
May 21, 2006
Messages
35,317
Location
Valhalla
....snip...

But I can quickly see that if you are not FOR a thread, you are not allowed to post an opinion that may not agree because it is assumed you do not know anything.

We do not "assume" nor disallow opinions. We do discuss, require cites when appropriate.

Don't dismiss us because all have not jumped to embrace your thoughts. Tolerance is a two way street.

Wanna take a "do over"? :D
 

paramedic70002

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 14, 2006
Messages
1,440
Location
Franklin, VA, Virginia, USA
Peter, I completely agree with your opposition to P4P in principle, but allowing EMS to OC is NEVER going to happen. There must be a vehicle for them to CC or the whole thing is dead in the water. Now if that means giving them an exception to 18.2-308 like LEOs have, again I see widespread opposition.
 

peter nap

Accomplished Advocate
Joined
Oct 16, 2007
Messages
13,551
Location
Valhalla
1. I do "not" want police powers.

.

I didn't say you did Jay, in fact you've been pretty open minded...but be careful what you wish for. There are unintended consequences and plenty of your peers would jump on the Cinder Cop idea.
My feelings about EMS are a matter of record here and as long as I'm conscious, I'll never meet one again. When I was a volunteer firefighter we were NOT part of the local Government, there was no E911 system, we generated our OWN money, bought our Own Equipment and ran things as we saw fit to serve OUR OWN COMMUNITY. Enough on that subject.:mad:

An example of what can happen occurred this afternoon. I bought an Ipad at Best Buy to run a camera Drone and a Cable Employee was there drumming up business. I told him no and he pushed it. I explained I didn't like wires, didn't like the Cable Company and was getting tired of him.

This Idiot started tooting his own horn and pulled out a FEMA ID while telling me what a great champion of the people in Louisa he was.

The conversation degraded from there but apparently a number of utility company employees also work for the FEDS part time.

It doesn't take a lot of imagination to see armed and trained EMS workers being pressed into Auxiliary Police service.
 

Jay

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2009
Messages
307
Location
Charlottesville, VA
I changed a few things in what Paramedic posted one of the things that I personally did not like is the employer being able to prohibt the ability of someone being able to carry for cause.
What is cause? They do not like the shoes I am wearing? I forgot to shave my face? I raised my voice to a non complient patient? The only time I think that a firearm can be prohibited is by reason of any statue that is already in place that prohibitis carrying of a firearm or other dangerous weapon. I also do not feel you need a CCW and the 40 hr. course when you are within the commonwealth to carry concealed. If you want a CCW for purpose of reciprocity with other states and/or if HR 822 passes then you will need to make application through the appopriate circuit court.


Please I want feedback??




EMS PROVIDERS' SAFETY AND RIGHT TO SELF DEFENSE ACT OF 2011


On duty EMS (Emergency Medical Services) personnel are authorized to carry firearms and other tools for safety and self defense, to include edged, impact, chemical and electrical devices, provided certain conditions are met and all other firearms law are observed.

On duty EMS personnel may be armed at all times except when entering the secured areas of correctional facilities.

1. The on duty EMS provider must have satisfactorily completed a VA DCJS firearms qualification program, and requalify to the same standard as law enforcement as set-forth by VA DCJS.

2.The on duty EMS provider must remain in compliance with his employer's guidelines forcarrying a firearm pertaining to safety systems of the firearm and holster, and requirement of factory manufactured ammunition.

An on duty EMS provider is defined as 1. A person certified by the Virginia Department of Health, Division of EMS; and 2. Any career or volunteer EMS provider who is either staffing a licensed EMS vehicle or EMS station, or who is "on call" and has responded to a request for EMS services.

VA DCJS certification satisfies compliance with the statute for the purposes of training.

VA DCJS certified law enforcement officers who are exempt from 18.2-308 for the purpose of obtaining a Concealed Handgun Permit are exempt from the carry permit requirement of this statute. (EMS Providers would be exempt from 18.2-308 as well after meeting firearms qualification as defined above. Any EMS Provider wishing to obtain a Concealed Handgun Permit for purposes of reciprocity aggreements that Virginia has with other states for carrying of firearms would still need to make application through the appropriate circuit court in the district of where the provider resides)

This does not give EMS Personell statutary powers of arrest.
 

Jay

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 3, 2009
Messages
307
Location
Charlottesville, VA
My letter to Senator Creigh Deeds this has not been sent yet and I would like comment.

11/15/2011

Senator Creigh Deeds,

Mr. Deeds I first would like to congratulate you on your re-election to the State Senate for District 25. With the new Legislative Session approaching quickly I felt this would be the appropriate time to introduce a new act called “EMS Providers’ Safety and Right to Self Defense Act”. This is a common sense act that allows Emergency Medical Responders to carry firearms or other dangerous weapon with them while performing their duties once certain criteria that I have outlined have been met. This act will also allow personnel to carry a concealed firearm anywhere within the commonwealth of Virginia when off-duty in the event they that might be called at a moment’s notice to respond to an emergency. This is not an act that would give EMS personnel statutory power of arrest. It is merely a way for EMS personnel to protect themselves in a self-defense situation in the absence of law enforcement should the need arise.

Some background I have been an Emergency Medical Technician for the last sixteen years, and have had my share of extremely close calls. Safety among like persons in my profession has been a constant struggle. (According to a study by the National Association of EMT’s in 2005) The No. 1 injury to EMS providers is assault with the national average at 1.8 per 10,000 workers per year. Healthcare providers are more likely to be assaulted on the job than police officers or prison guards. The relative risk for EMS workers is about 30 times higher than the national average. Yet some EMS agencies continue to not allow us to carry a weapon for personal protection.

The Virginia Office of Emergency Medical Services is taxed with creating and enforcing regulations that EMS departments must adhere to in order to be a licensed provider for the commonwealth. There was a regulation that stated only law enforcement could carry firearms while on an ambulance. However the office received much opposition over the regulation, and although there is a revision that strikes it technically it still exists until the governor signs off. There has been a letter issued by the Office of Emergency Medical Services giving directive to their enforcement personnel that they are not to enforce the regulation should someone carry a weapon on an ambulance that is not law enforcement. This is a huge plus for EMS providers, but it still does not prevent individual organizations from preventing personnel from carrying weapons while they are on duty. Should the act that I have given you be passed it would prevent agencies from doing this.

I will be asking the National Rifle Association, Virginia Citizens Defense League, and fellow EMS providers to support this crucial act. I urge you to please introduce and sponsor this act at the next legislative session in 2012. Help us to protect ourselves while we continue to put our lives on the line so that others may live.
 
Last edited:

Marco

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2007
Messages
3,905
Location
Greene County
Now if that means giving them(EMS) an exception to 18.2-308 like LEOs have, again I see widespread opposition.


I would oppose.
I don't believe LEO and other exepmted folks should be allowed to carry where avg citizens can't.

On the job/clock sure, off the job/clock NO.
 
Top