• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

LEO and CCL????

littlewolf

Regular Member
Joined
May 10, 2010
Messages
349
Location
A, A
While I have not received mine yet, in the CCL class the instructions were if you are carrying and stopped to provide your CCL with your drivers license and to inform the officer you are armed. If you are not armed there is no reason to provide your CCL. The license is your "permission" to carry a firearm concealed, and if you are not carrying there is no reason to provide proof you have said permissions.

Thank You,Hope you get yours soon. Even though the law does not require you to tell LEO unless they ask and if you are carrying and have a license to do so,it is a good idea to inform them just in case some unforeseen circumstances occur and they find out on their own and end up shooting your dumb arse for being hard headed.

If you are not carrying why in the world would you provide that information ?
 

Brass Magnet

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2009
Messages
2,818
Location
Right Behind You!, Wisconsin, USA
Thank You,Hope you get yours soon. Even though the law does not require you to tell LEO unless they ask and if you are carrying and have a license to do so,it is a good idea to inform them just in case some unforeseen circumstances occur and they find out on their own and end up shooting your dumb arse for being hard headed.

You might change your mind the first time you or someone you know gets dragged out of a car at gun point for kindly giving up your rights by "informing" them.

Ever see some of the videos from the duty to inform states like Ohio? The one were the cop keeps telling a permit holder to shut up, keeping him from informing? When the guy finally gets a word in the cop tells him he should have just shot him and then proceeds to continually verbally abuse him. You should be able to google that video up.

Or how about the guy in Texas that gets physically and verbally abused?

There's a big problem with "duty to inform". We should be happy we didn't get that forced on us and I can't see why you'd want to volunteer it.

You're free to do as you wish but there's nothing dumb or hard headed about exercising your rights.
 

GlockRDH

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 24, 2010
Messages
626
Location
north of the Peoples Republic of Madison
I have 2 friends that are LEOs...one is a state patrol the other Columbia county deputy... the SP officer said that if he stops someone hed like for that person to let him know...the county deputy said that they havent had any formal training on what to do/not do...otherwise he said he doesnt care one way or the other as to seeing the CCL. He agreed with my statement to him, 'the bad guy isnt going to tell you if he has a gun anyway'....
 

protias

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
7,308
Location
SE, WI
You might change your mind the first time you or someone you know gets dragged out of a car at gun point for kindly giving up your rights by "informing" them.

Ever see some of the videos from the duty to inform states like Ohio? The one were the cop keeps telling a permit holder to shut up, keeping him from informing? When the guy finally gets a word in the cop tells him he should have just shot him and then proceeds to continually verbally abuse him. You should be able to google that video up.

Or how about the guy in Texas that gets physically and verbally abused?

There's a big problem with "duty to inform". We should be happy we didn't get that forced on us and I can't see why you'd want to volunteer it.

You're free to do as you wish but there's nothing dumb or hard headed about exercising your rights.

Here is that video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ypX6FmzBXkY
 

Firearms Iinstuctor

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2011
Messages
3,431
Location
northern wis
I wouldn't inform unless I have to by law. Or for some reason my actions well expose my firearm IE reaching for drivers lic registration ect.

One should keep his documents away from his weapon, carry them so when accessing them you do not expose or reach near your weapon.


For exsample you would have a weapon in your glove box along with your registration and insurance and you have to dig them out. I would inform the officer that I am a lic CCW holder my registration is in my glove box and I have weapon in there also.

LEO's don't like surprizes

It wouldn't hurt to do a little role play acting with freinds to prepare yourself in case you get stopped for that traffic violation.
 

xmanhockey7

Regular Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2010
Messages
1,195
I don't see why, in the absence of RAS you are required to answer a question about 'any (blah-blah) on board'. If it's a traffic stop and not a flight from a bank robbery (lol), why not just say:

"Am I required to answer that? My attorney told me in traffic stops I'm only required to give license and insurance and not answer any questions."

(in a non-disclosure state, obviously where you have to tell the officer up front)

Well looking at the fact they can lie to you why not just say, "I have nothing that is going to harm you." If they try to follow up simply say "I do not wish to discuss the contents in my vehicle."
 

dmworken

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2007
Messages
41
Location
Greendale, Wisconsin, USA
Every one of you have valid points what to and what not to say to a LEO. The bottom line is; be respectful and keep your cool. Every village, township, city, or state will vary in their tactics to get you to talk. Be professional even if the LEO may not be.
 

Captain Nemo

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
1,029
Location
Somewhere, Wisconsin, USA
The words in the letter that accompanies the CCL license reads: "These documents must be displayed to a law enforcement officer upon request while the officer is acting in an official capacity and with lawful authority". As usual the DoJ weasle worded it to the benefit of law enforcement. Certainly an on dutry officer detaining us for a traffic stop is acting in official capacity and certainly he/she has the lawful authority to do so. Might be just as well to swallow our constitutional pride and display our CCL at the get go. After all we all did that when we submitted our CCL applications.
 

protias

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
7,308
Location
SE, WI
The words in the letter that accompanies the CCL license reads: "These documents must be displayed to a law enforcement officer upon request while the officer is acting in an official capacity and with lawful authority". As usual the DoJ weasle worded it to the benefit of law enforcement. Certainly an on dutry officer detaining us for a traffic stop is acting in official capacity and certainly he/she has the lawful authority to do so. Might be just as well to swallow our constitutional pride and display our CCL at the get go. After all we all did that when we submitted our CCL applications.

Unless you a driving and have no CCL. Then you have no steeeeekin permit to hand over. :lol:
 

wild boar

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
445
Location
wisconsin
I can't understand why a person who is armed would want to piss anyone off. If you are stopped, your knee jerk opinion of weather RAS exists is of no importance. The LEO is in charge, and you pressing the envelope will only result in him making your day really bad. The DOJ chose to call the sidearms we carry weapons, the word weapon carries with it a mind set meaning to antis that creates alarm. You're not giving up rights by offering comfort to what could be a bad situation. Caring enough about your rights requires some cooperation, stopping something from becoming a problem, could stop it from becoming a law. IMHO, boar out.
 

protias

Regular Member
Joined
Dec 18, 2008
Messages
7,308
Location
SE, WI
I can't understand why a person who is armed would want to piss anyone off. If you are stopped, your knee jerk opinion of weather RAS exists is of no importance. The LEO is in charge, and you pressing the envelope will only result in him making your day really bad. The DOJ chose to call the sidearms we carry weapons, the word weapon carries with it a mind set meaning to antis that creates alarm. You're not giving up rights by offering comfort to what could be a bad situation. Caring enough about your rights requires some cooperation, stopping something from becoming a problem, could stop it from becoming a law. IMHO, boar out.

It was either in VA or WA where a judge ruled that just because someone is armed, doesn't mean he cannot get upset.
 

Brass Magnet

Founder's Club Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2009
Messages
2,818
Location
Right Behind You!, Wisconsin, USA
I can't understand why a person who is armed would want to piss anyone off. If you are stopped, your knee jerk opinion of weather RAS exists is of no importance. The LEO is in charge, and you pressing the envelope will only result in him making your day really bad. The DOJ chose to call the sidearms we carry weapons, the word weapon carries with it a mind set meaning to antis that creates alarm. You're not giving up rights by offering comfort to what could be a bad situation. Caring enough about your rights requires some cooperation, stopping something from becoming a problem, could stop it from becoming a law. IMHO, boar out.

Why should peaceably exercising your rights piss off an LEO? If it does, it's the LEO's problem and not mine. One doesn't need a "Knee Jerk opinion" about RAS but can have an educated one. Exercising your rights is not "pressing the envelope" an LEO violating them is and you plainly ARE giving up rights for comfort.

Like I said, you can do what you want but remember that exercising your rights will eventually make it easier on all of us even if it's inconvenient for you at the time. Heck, a twice arrested member of the Madison 5 could have just gave the nice ossifur his ID too and our cause would have never advanced as fast as it has.
 

Helorob

Regular Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2011
Messages
34
Location
S.E. WI
Caring enough about your rights requires some cooperation, stopping something from becoming a problem, could stop it from becoming a law. IMHO, boar out.

Being new to the carry envirionment, I think this makes sense. Of course, I reserve the right to change my mind and not admit to it (I have a permit for that :rolleyes:, although it is not valid in the home - according to my wife).

wild boar: I think your signature line kinda says the same thing as your post?.
 

wild boar

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
445
Location
wisconsin
I will not escalate a situation with a bad guy, or the police. Brass M you're entitled to do as you will, I will do the same. we all have a cross to burn, mine is not enforcement, or the Constitution. I know what my rights are, and I hold them dear; as far as the cause sir, i've fought too. boar out.
 

Captain Nemo

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
1,029
Location
Somewhere, Wisconsin, USA
Yup Helorob wives are stronger than the constitution. They always have been. When I was younger there was a saying "The stronger sex is the weaker sex because of the weakness of the stronger sex for the weaker sex".
 

BROKENSPROKET

Regular Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2010
Messages
2,199
Location
Trempealeau County
I can't understand why a person who is armed would want to piss anyone off. If you are stopped, your knee jerk opinion of weather RAS exists is of no importance. The LEO is in charge, and you pressing the envelope will only result in him making your day really bad. The DOJ chose to call the sidearms we carry weapons, the word weapon carries with it a mind set meaning to antis that creates alarm. You're not giving up rights by offering comfort to what could be a bad situation. Caring enough about your rights requires some cooperation, stopping something from becoming a problem, could stop it from becoming a law. IMHO, boar out.


And this very attitude give a police state more power. Surrender your rights, then don't cry when you don't have any.
 
Last edited:

wild boar

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 2, 2011
Messages
445
Location
wisconsin
Pretentious hard liners such...

And this very attitude give a police state more power. Surrender your rights, then don't cry when you don't have any.


...as depicted in your writings must have lived a life of oppression. I find no other reason for one to cling to a freedom they have never known. What drives such possessive anger that one forsakes their rights for a fleeting moment of defiance. What the hell is your age, where have you been, and what have you done for, and to your country? In 1973 I swore an oath to God, and Country to protect, and honor the Constitution, and to date I have, do, and will for ever fulfill this obligation. boar out.
 

hermannr

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 24, 2011
Messages
2,327
Location
Okanogan Highland
I don't know specifically about WI, but I have carried here in WA for over 40 years, and even though I do not get stopped very often, (Couple months ago was first time in 15 years) I have been stopped, but I have never been asked for my CPL, ever. Your WI milage may very until your local law enforcement gets used to the idea that they are not the only ones that can carry. Average citizens have been able to carry here in WA forever.

Here in WA: I do know that when an officer stops you and checks your DL on his computer, the screen comes back with your CPL, so every officer automatically knows I have a CPL when he checks my DL. Most of the time they now approach the vehicle from the right side (officer safety/traffic) at least on the two lane roads I frequent, and my carry is in full sight on my hip when they do that...(unless I have a jacket on)

As I said, NEVER, here in WA, in over 40 years, have I been asked for my CPL, ever. One encounter with MWAG call that I did actually talk to the Deputy, (Hunting? Yep) I was not even asked for ID. Also, you do not need a CPL to carry (CC or OC) a pistol for self protection when recreating, as in hunting, fishing, hiking etc.

Of course, I do dress like a farmer, and I live in an agricultural county back in the woods on the dry side...but I have never been asked even when I have been stopped on I5 on the wet/highly populated side of the state either.
 

skidmark

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
10,444
Location
Valhalla
It was either in VA or WA where a judge ruled that just because someone is armed, doesn't mean he cannot get upset.

Hey! I resemble that ruling. (Where's the pointy index finger smiley?)

Getting back on topic -- from what I've read about your bew law it says the cop can ask for it and you have to show it to him. That's pretty much what the law says here - there might be a few different words but at the end of the day it works out pretty much the same. Some folks here pull the permit out and put t next to te DL because they figure the LEO is going to get a computer notification that the registration comes back to someone with a CHP. Others leave it in the wallet unless and until the LEO asks for it. What we have over you folks is history on both sides of the badge that the mere presence of the handgun (OC or CC) does not change the dynamic and demeanor of the encounter between LEO and driver/passenger.

There is nothing I am aware of that "proves" that showing the permit at the beginning of the encounter endangers the "right" or priviledge of carrying concealed, or that withholding it until specifically told (asked?) to display it protects it.

stay safe.
 
Top