• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

*breaking news*

johnny amish

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2010
Messages
1,024
Location
High altitude of Vernon County, ,
Without stand your ground, it's barely worth the paper it's printed on. This isn't a BIG step at all, it's a very tiny one.

I could not agree more. With that being said it 235 years to get in this country where we are at today, it will probably take that and then some to get back to a nation that cherish liberties and freedom.
 
Last edited:

detroit_fan

Regular Member
Joined
Mar 27, 2009
Messages
1,172
Location
Monroe, Michigan, USA
Unfortunately, you have posted in the Wisconsin forum. For better or worse, Michigan law is not the "law of the land" in Wisconsin.

I was replying to davegran asking if Michigan residents had civil immunity. When I said "we" I was referring to MI residents, sorry if I was not clear.
 

Captain Nemo

Regular Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2010
Messages
1,029
Location
Somewhere, Wisconsin, USA
Nutczac: I agree. There never has been a statute that requires that a person retreat from danger. The closest any come is the statement in the defense of self or others statute that implies that the minimum force required to defuse the situation should be used. That statement is of course subjective. The only thing that specific "stand your ground" language in AB69 would have brought to the table is not needing to prove we or a third party was in imminent danger of death or great bodily harm. There would be a presumption of innocense.
 

SovereignAxe

Regular Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2011
Messages
791
Location
Elizabethton, TN
As someone that has a stand your ground law, I would like to congratualate you Wisconsonites. This should be law in all 50 states. No one should ever be required to run and hide from an attacker.
 

E6chevron

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
528
Location
Milwaukee Wisconsin
Not only "in your home", but in your "Dwelling".My driveway happens to be 900 feet long.... So if my wife walks out to the mailbox and somebody attacks her, she can pull out her concealed weapon and defend herself with immunity. That is close to "Stand Your Ground".

As has already been pointed out, the crucial factor in receiving "stand your ground" treatment or even "your home is your castle" privilege is the requirement in the statute created by AB69 for the bad guy to either be in the process of or having completed: "unlawfully and forcibly entering"

I do not think that a person (bad guy) who walked across a property line, or walked or drove up a driveway would meet this requirement.
 

davegran

Regular Member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,563
Location
Cassville Area -Twelve Miles From Anything, Wiscon
As has already been pointed out, the crucial factor in receiving "stand your ground" treatment or even "your home is your castle" privilege is the requirement in the statute created by AB69 for the bad guy to either be in the process of or having completed: "unlawfully and forcibly entering"

I do not think that a person (bad guy) who walked across a property line, or walked or drove up a driveway would meet this requirement.
Then why was "driveway" included in the definition of "Dwelling?
895.07 (1)(h) “Dwelling” means any premises or portion of a premises
that is used as a home or a place of residence and that part of the
lot or site on which the dwelling is situated that is devoted to resi-
dential use. “Dwelling” includes other existing structures on the
immediate residential premises such as driveways, sidewalks,
swimming pools, terraces, patios, fences, porches, garages, and
basements.
 

davegran

Regular Member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,563
Location
Cassville Area -Twelve Miles From Anything, Wiscon
Because somebody's too ignorant to use curtilage as other states do.
No... "curtilage" would have been much more restrictive.
cur·ti·lage (kûr
prime.gif
tl-
ibreve.gif
j)n. Law The enclosed area immediately surrounding a house or dwelling.
 
H

Herr Heckler Koch

Guest
No... "curtilage" would have been much more restrictive.
You are a victim of the dictionary fallacy.

As a legal term of art, it is the tended area in which one lives. A fence is not an essential element but illustrative of one's curtilage. A synonym might be 'grounds', as the groomed area within the walls of a manor house that excepts the agricultural lands. A barn stands on the curtilage but not a cornfield.
 

davegran

Regular Member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,563
Location
Cassville Area -Twelve Miles From Anything, Wiscon
You are a victim of the dictionary fallacy.

As a legal term of art, it is the tended area in which one lives. A fence is not an essential element but illustrative of one's curtilage. A synonym might be 'grounds', as the groomed area within the walls of a manor house that excepts the agricultural lands. A barn stands on the curtilage but not a cornfield.
I supplied the legal definition I found. That's what the "n Law" means. Do you have a different citation?
 

Flipper

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Apr 21, 2009
Messages
1,140
Location
, Wisconsin, USA
what is the meaning of forcibly entering? bad guy coming in an unlocked door...yes or no
 
Last edited:
H

Herr Heckler Koch

Guest
The dictionary fallacy is the fallacy that there is an exclusive precise meaning

http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/curtilage/
uslegal.com said:
Curtilage Law & Legal Definition

Curtilage is the immediate, enclosed area surrounding a house or dwelling. The U.S. Supreme Court noted in United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (1987), that curtilage is the area immediately surrounding a residence that "harbors the `intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life.'' Curtilage, like a house, is protected under the fourth amendment from "unreasonable searches and seizures.''

Determining the boundaries of curtilage is imprecise and subject to controversy. Four of the factors used to dtermine whether to classify the area as curtilage include:

1) The distance from the home to the place claimed to be curtilage (the closer the home is, the more likely to be curtilage);

2) Whether the area claimed to be curtilage is included within an enclosure surrounding the home;

3) The nature of use to which the area is put (if it is the site of domestic activities, it is more likely to be a part of the curtilage); and

4) The steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by people passing by (shielding from public view will favor finding the portion is curtilage).
Notice that in factors, enclosure is not essential.

There is a Wikipedia article "Curtilage" also. Lay folk should always consult a good primer of a new and unfamiliar topic. I do.

There is the usage of Wisconsin Statutes Subsection 943.13 as negation predicate to the subject open-land.
 
Last edited:

davegran

Regular Member
Joined
May 1, 2009
Messages
1,563
Location
Cassville Area -Twelve Miles From Anything, Wiscon
http://definitions.uslegal.com/c/curtilage/
Originally Posted by uslegal.com Curtilage Law & Legal Definition

Curtilage is the immediate, enclosed area surrounding a house or dwelling. The U.S. Supreme Court noted in United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (1987), that curtilage is the area immediately surrounding a residence that "harbors the `intimate activity associated with the sanctity of a man's home and the privacies of life.'' Curtilage, like a house, is protected under the fourth amendment from "unreasonable searches and seizures.''

Determining the boundaries of curtilage is imprecise and subject to controversy. Four of the factors used to dtermine whether to classify the area as curtilage include:

1) The distance from the home to the place claimed to be curtilage (the closer the home is, the more likely to be curtilage);

2) Whether the area claimed to be curtilage is included within an enclosure surrounding the home;

3) The nature of use to which the area is put (if it is the site of domestic activities, it is more likely to be a part of the curtilage); and

4) The steps taken by the resident to protect the area from observation by people passing by (shielding from public view will favor finding the portion is curtilage).
Notice that in factors, enclosure is not essential.

There is a Wikipedia article "Curtilage" also. Lay folk should always consult a good primer of a new and unfamiliar topic. I do.

There is the usage of Wisconsin Statutes Subsection 943.13 as negation predicate to the subject open-land.
So by spelling out the definition of Dwelling as they did
895.07 (1)(h) “Dwelling” means any premises or portion of a premises
that is used as a home or a place of residence and that part of the
lot or site on which the dwelling is situated that is devoted to resi-
dential use. “Dwelling” includes other existing structures on the
immediate residential premises such as driveways, sidewalks,
swimming pools, terraces, patios, fences, porches, garages, and
basements.
they eliminated the imprecision and controversy of using a Middle English, from Old French word, "curtilage". I applaud them for not confounding us and complicating the law with unnecessary lawyer-speak....
 
H

Herr Heckler Koch

Guest
I applaud you for moving beyond the fallacy of reading a dictionary as a word textbook or instruction manual.

It is disappointing that Wisconsin must compulsively climb the same learning curve that other states have already surmounted.
 

E6chevron

Regular Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2011
Messages
528
Location
Milwaukee Wisconsin
Then why was "driveway" included in the definition of "Dwelling?

The definition of "Dwelling" comes from section 895.07 titled "Claims against contractors and suppliers." This section was created in April of 2005.

That definition of "Dwelling" was not intended to be a good foundation for a Castle Doctrine section 895.62 or "no duty to retreat" statute subsection: 939.48(1m). These two new pieces of statute come from 11AB69.
 
Last edited:
Top