Haz.
Regular Member
I hope I am not our of line posting this here? Feel free to move or delet this post Admin., if so. Haz.
Do you people in the USA see the Judge Judy show? Its very popular Down Under. I was watching it last night only because it conserned a young Virginian man who was o'cing at a party at a public bar. The young mans partner was suing him for repairs to her cars dashboard and windscreen due to the fact that the firearm was accidently discharged by the young man. He stated that his partner carried on regarding the fact that she was uncomfortable with him open carring at the party and having the firearm lying beside him on the car seat when they finally left. The reason he was driving her car was because he knew the area and how to get to the venue. It came out during Judge Judy's questioning that the young man was licenced, and that he did in fact open carry at the party. He did accidently discharge the firearm whilst trying to remove the magazine whilst driving because of his partners carrying on, and the bullet passed up through the dashboard and through the windscreen smashing it!
What amazed me was Judge Judy's questioning of the young man. I know she carries on like a school mar'm because of the amount of showmanship required to keep people interested in the program. This is what she asked, and he answered her.
Question: "Are you licenced, or allowed to own and open carry a firearm in a public place?"
Defendant: "Yes your honor."
Question: "What type of MORON open carries in a public bar whilst attending an arranged party?"
Defender: "I dont know your honor."
Question: "How many other MORONS were open carrying in the bar?"
Defender: "None your honor."
I couldn't believe what I was hearing. How could she be allowed to get away with that type of questioning? Or is this just another made up show like lets pretend we are wrestling, someone may believe its true.
They do make the statement before the show that the people are real, the cases are real, the judgments are final? If so, she is very biased and anti-firearm. In her opinion, according to her questioning of the young man, who admitted he did make a mistake trying to remove the mag. whislt driving, people who open carry are MORONS?
Do you people in the USA see the Judge Judy show? Its very popular Down Under. I was watching it last night only because it conserned a young Virginian man who was o'cing at a party at a public bar. The young mans partner was suing him for repairs to her cars dashboard and windscreen due to the fact that the firearm was accidently discharged by the young man. He stated that his partner carried on regarding the fact that she was uncomfortable with him open carring at the party and having the firearm lying beside him on the car seat when they finally left. The reason he was driving her car was because he knew the area and how to get to the venue. It came out during Judge Judy's questioning that the young man was licenced, and that he did in fact open carry at the party. He did accidently discharge the firearm whilst trying to remove the magazine whilst driving because of his partners carrying on, and the bullet passed up through the dashboard and through the windscreen smashing it!
What amazed me was Judge Judy's questioning of the young man. I know she carries on like a school mar'm because of the amount of showmanship required to keep people interested in the program. This is what she asked, and he answered her.
Question: "Are you licenced, or allowed to own and open carry a firearm in a public place?"
Defendant: "Yes your honor."
Question: "What type of MORON open carries in a public bar whilst attending an arranged party?"
Defender: "I dont know your honor."
Question: "How many other MORONS were open carrying in the bar?"
Defender: "None your honor."
I couldn't believe what I was hearing. How could she be allowed to get away with that type of questioning? Or is this just another made up show like lets pretend we are wrestling, someone may believe its true.
They do make the statement before the show that the people are real, the cases are real, the judgments are final? If so, she is very biased and anti-firearm. In her opinion, according to her questioning of the young man, who admitted he did make a mistake trying to remove the mag. whislt driving, people who open carry are MORONS?
Last edited: