• We are now running on a new, and hopefully much-improved, server. In addition we are also on new forum software. Any move entails a lot of technical details and I suspect we will encounter a few issues as the new server goes live. Please be patient with us. It will be worth it! :) Please help by posting all issues here.
  • The forum will be down for about an hour this weekend for maintenance. I apologize for the inconvenience.
  • If you are having trouble seeing the forum then you may need to clear your browser's DNS cache. Click here for instructions on how to do that
  • Please review the Forum Rules frequently as we are constantly trying to improve the forum for our members and visitors.

Baltimore PD decides that paying out settlements is more cost-effective than training

Dreamer

Regular Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2009
Messages
5,360
Location
Grennsboro NC
http://www.baltimorebrew.com/2011/11/23/city-to-pay-107k-to-settle-two-more-police-lawsuits/
Last week, it was revealed at a City Council hearing that Baltimore has spent $10.4 million in the past three years defending the Baltimore Police Department against lawsuits.

In fiscal year 2011, the city spent $3.5 million on settling lawsuits against the Police Department, including in-houses expenses and fees for private attorneys hired to defend the police.



http://www.foxbaltimore.com/newsroom/features/cover_story/videos/vid_641.shtml
The (Civilian Review) board says it has processed 829 allegations of false imprisonment, false arrest, and abusive language from city residents. However, the agency would not release details on any of the cases.


http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2011/10/15/baltimore-pd-fails-to-train-after-cop-shootings/
The report says the department for years has not done the so-called “after-action” reviews of officer-involved shootings.

The reviews are used to train officers, and are called for under the department’s own guidelines.
 
Last edited:

skidmark

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 15, 2007
Messages
10,444
Location
Valhalla
Always has been cheaper to pay out than to train/retrain. Also limits the liability if you skip the training - until you get nailed by a lawsuit that deals with the refusal/failure to train, which most folks do not address in their lawsuits.

stay safe.
 

since9

Campaign Veteran
Joined
Jan 14, 2010
Messages
6,964
Location
Colorado Springs, Colorado, USA
Always has been cheaper to pay out than to train/retrain.

Really?

Also limits the liability if you skip the training - until you get nailed by a lawsuit that deals with the refusal/failure to train, which most folks do not address in their lawsuits.

Oh, well, that's why. I was factoring the additional award against the city for failing to train to minimum standards in the first place.
 
Top